Every Catholic must accept Vatican Council II.All Catholics must affirm the Council.This is obligatory.The Council can only be interpreted rationally, with the Rational Premise.There is only one option

Every Catholic must accept Vatican Council II.All Catholics must affirm the Council.This is obligatory.The Council can only be interpreted rationally, with the Rational Premise.There is only one option.It is not the irrational option.The irrational premise is unethical and not Catholic.It is dishonest.

The Rational Premise used over centuries is inspired by the Holy Spirit.It is Magisterial.The False Premise is not Magisterial.

When the popes interpret Vatican Council II with the False Premise they are not Magisterial.They make an objective error.They confuse what is physically invisible (LG 8,14,16 etc) as being physically visible. Then they infer that these are visible examples of salvation outside the Church, non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water. Then they conclude that Vatican Council II is a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, which had no exceptions, for the Councils which defined. So they say that Vatican Council II has brought in a new revolution, a new revelation.It has made the Athanasius Creed and the past ecclesiocentric of the Church,obsolete.

This of course is the false reasoning of the liberals and the left.We know know that if there was anyone saved outside the Church in the present times (1965-2022) it would only be known to God.We cannot meet or see someone saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance. This was the false premise of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston.It was not Magisterial since the Holy Spirit could not make a factual mistake and contradict the past Magisterium on EENS etc.

Now that we have discovered the factual error in the Church we can interpret Vatican Council II rationally and affirm the Council in harmony with Feeneyite EENS, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of Pope Pius X and the Catechism of the Catholic Church of Pope John Paul II.

This is important.

SCOTT HAHN REJECTS VATICAN COUNCIL II

Since Vatican Council II (Irrational) for Scott Hahn and Michael Lofton the Bible has made a mistake. There are two versions of John 3:5.One of the past and one of the present.Two versions of the Bible?.

I interpret the Council with the Rational Premise, Feeneyism. Invisible cases of LG 8, 14 and 16 are invisible in 2022.So the Council does not contradict John 3:5(all need the baptism of water for salvation).There is no new version.

 

But in Scot Hahn and Michael Lofton's biblical scholarship Jesus’ teaching in John 3:5 and Mark 16:16 has in public to be put aside.They do not accept Vatican Council II. They do not affirm Vatican Council II in public.Otherwise they would be Feeneyite on extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Left will object.How could Scott Hahn be allowed to teach theology? The bishop will not permit it.So like the bishop Scott Hahn rejects Vatican Council II, He would know that the Council has the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.There is no other rational option He has to reject the Council, to keep his teaching job at the University of Steubenville, Department of Theology and to speak as an apologist on EWTN.-Lionel Andrades