There are two interpretations of Vatican Council II and the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the irrational one.
There are two interpretations of Vatican Council II and the national Catechechtical Centers and Bishops Conferences choose the irrational option.
There are two interpretations of Vatican Council II and the popes from Paul VI to Francis have not chosen the rational interpretation.The rational option supports the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). So Vatican Council II is dogmatic. It is in harmony with the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.
There are two interpretations of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance and the popes from Pius XII have not chosen the rational one.
There are two interpretations of the Nicene, Apostles and Athanasius Creed and the popes from Pius XII and the traditionalists, have chosen the irrational one. Since they interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance irrationally.
So the catechesis for adults and children, the teaching at First Communion and Confirmation, must return to only the rational interpretation, with the rational premise, inference and traditional conclusion.- Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 8, 2021
The Jesuit magazine America in this video hides information on Vatican Council II. There are two interpretations of the Council. This is not mentioned.The irrational version has to be accepted by all priests in all Rites including Novus Ordo to receive permission to offer Holy Mass.
AUGUST 1, 2013
THERE ARE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF VATICAN COUNCIL II IN FORCE BUT THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE RATIONAL ONE
-J Daniels
August 1, 2013 at 5:10 PM
I am pointing out that one can choose to interpret Vatican Council II by using a particular premise or without that premise. In this way there are always two interpretations.
It has nothing to do with me or my views.
It is the same text for all but it can be interpreted with the Richard Cushing Error or without it.
Assume the dead now saved in Heaven are visible to us on earth and so are an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or assume that they are not visible to us and so are not exceptions. This is independent of me.
So assume LG 16 refers to being saved in invincible ignorance which is visible or it refers to cases not visible to us and so which are not an exception to the dogmatic teaching which says all need to convert into the Church.So there can be two interpretations but only one rational one.
There are presently two interpretations since most Catholics,including the Vatican Curia are using the irrational one, they can allegedly see the dead.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment