At the pontifical universities in Rome the Catholic professors do not interpret Vatican Concil II in harmony with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the past exclusivist ecclesiology. They are doing this so that they can keep their teaching jobs.

   

 from Twitter

 

At the pontifical universities in Rome the Catholic professors do not interpret Vatican Concil II in harmony with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the past exclusivist ecclesiology. They are doing this so that they can keep their teaching jobs.

So there are no missionary and outreach organisations in Rome which will proclaim the Catholic Faith based upon Vatican Council II interpreted rationally in harmony with the Athanasius Creed and the ecclesiology of St.Francis Xavier and the founders of the Jesuit community.

I can affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism of Pope Pius X. The two popes and Patrick Coffin cannot do the same.This is because I use a Rational Premise and Coffin and the popes choose the Irrational Option.

The sedevacantists interpret Vatican Council II irrationally like the present two popes. I choose the Rational Premise and so there is the hermeneutic of continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the rest of Tradition- which the two popes do not affirm.

Since we can interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with the Catechism of Pope Pius X and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the sedevacantists are heretical on Vatican Council II and they cannot even deny it.

The Most Holy Trinity Seminary(MHT) of Bishop Donald Sanborn does not interpret Vatican Council II rationally like me. Their interpretation of Magisterial Documents( Creeds and Catechisms etc) is heretical and yet Bishop Sanborn is ordaining new priests, with no clarification or correction.

Vatican Council II interpreted with an Irrational Premise has to be discarded but Vatican Council II interpreted rationally must be accepted.

Cionci, Bugnolo, Mattei and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, do not deny that they are interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and that I choose the Rational Premise.They choose heresy and schism with also the Creeds- just like the present two popes.

There was no comment from Cionci, Bugnolo, Mattei and the CDF when Ruth Graham and Ross Douthat of the New York Times interpreted Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise and Inference.There was also no comment from Pontifex and no statement from the Vatican Press Office.

Cionci, Bugnolo and Mattei cannot say that they accept Vatican Council II and the Catechism of Pope Pius X.They have to accept one or the other.They have to reject one. Since they use the Irrational Premise which creates exceptions for EENS.It creates division.

Michael Voris would not be able to support the Catechism of Pope Pius X like me. Since the Archdiocese of Detroit and the Left will not allow him to interpret Vatican Council II like me.He is forced to use the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and so create a rupture with EENS.

We have not learnt from the conservative modernists at the Fisher-More College closure.Catholics must get back to Catholic theology and then the Novus Ordo Mass too will have the old ecclesiology.

Do not follow the conservative modernists in the Church they are really liberals on Vatican Council II etc.- Lionel Andrades