Could someone in public correct the errors of EWTN and Wikipedia ? Confusion at First Holy Communion and Confirmation classes

 message incomplete

At First Holy Communion and Confirmation classes the   religious instruction must be the same as that over the centuries since Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church when interpreted rationally are traditional. They support the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the missionaries in the 16^th century and the Apostles, Church Fathers and Patristic period. The  Council and the Catechism the Church indicate that in 2022-2023, outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation (Ad Gentes 7, CCC 845, 846, 1257 etc.).In Heaven there are only Catholics (AG 7).All need to be members of the Catholic Church to avoid the fires of Hell (Ad Gentes 7, Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors etc.).So on line articles/ reports which have misinformation on Church-doctrine must be corrected. They must not be allowed to interpret Magisterial Documents (Creeds, Catechisms, and Vatican Council II etc.) irrationally.

1. EWTN’s article by Fr. William Most titled 

Tragic Errors of Fr. Leonard Feeney 1 is one such irrational article. It interprets the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance deceptively with the Irrational Premise ( unknown cases of LG 16 are known, invisible cases of LG 14 are physically visible).Then it is inferred that there are objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.  The nontraditional conclusion is Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition (EENS, Syllabus etc.).

2. Wikipedia’s entries on Feeneyism, extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Fr. Leonard Feeney 2 also confuse invisible people referenced in Lumen Gentium 16 etc. as also being visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church.So they become objective exceptions for traditional EENS.

These are two political-left examples, irrational reports, with a nontraditional conclusion. They were not corrected, for political reasons, by Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.

Could someone in public correct the errors of 

EWTN and Wikipedia so that they can make 

the change ? The report on Vatican Council 

II by wikipedia also needs to be challenged.-Lionel Andrades

1.

Tragic Errors of Leonard Feeney

Author: Fr. William Most

CONTACT

EWTN | 5817 Old Leeds Rd. | Irondale, AL 35210 | 1-800-447-3986 | VIEWER@EWTN.COM

https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/tragic-errors-of-leonard-feeney-12314

Lionel L. Andrades

1431 set 2017

EWTN, Jeff Mirus, Fr.William Most's Internet report is an obstacle for the SSPX canonical recognition

https://gloria.tv/post/2AsXdgGVakmUDKWpH69XiZhRM

2

SEPTEMBER 1, 2017

________________________

Feeneyism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feeneyism

Leonard Feeney

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Feeney

Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extra_Ecclesiam_nulla_salus

Second Vatican Council

..But support for aggiornamento won out over resistance to change, and as a result the sixteen magisterial documents produced by the council proposed significant developments in doctrine and practice: an extensive reform of the liturgy, a renewed theology of the Church, of revelation and of the laity, a new approach to relations between the Church and the world, to ecumenism, to non-Christian religions and to religious freedom...

...Religious Freedom

The text on religious freedom proclaimed the right of everyone to freedom of religion. That is, freedom from coercion by the state in matters of religious belief and practice. It was well known that there was strong opposition to this declaration, perhaps even greater than to collegiality.^[109] Quite simply, it ran counter to the position the Catholic Church had defended for centuries...

...

From another perspective, Church historian John W. O'Malley writes:^[241]

For the new churches it recommended adaptation to local cultures, including philosophical and theological adaptation. It also recommended that Catholic missionaries seek ways of cooperating with missionaries of other faiths and of fostering harmonious relations with them. It asserted that art from every race and country be given scope in the liturgy of the church. More generally, it made clear that the church was sympathetic to the way of life of different peoples and races and was ready to appropriate aspects of different cultural traditions. Though obvious-sounding, these provisions were portentous. Where would they lead?...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Vatican_Council