If the SSPX priest admits that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican, do not contradict Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), since they are invisible and hypothetical only, then a Decree of Prohbitions will be issued against them by the Vatican and the Left.

 

If the SSPX priest at the chapel in Rome admits that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican, do not contradict Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), since they are invisible and hypothetical only, then a Decree of Prohbitions will be issued against them by the Vatican and the Left.

Since he is supporting the strict interpretation of EENS like the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16 th century, the SSPX this would not be tolerated.The SSPX could expel him to protect the community.

The SSPX at Albano will not comment on this issue.They will pretend that Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition and will criticize the Council.

This is approved for them by the Vatican and the Left. It is political.This is the false doctrinal issue that Pope Benedict wanted the SSPX to accept.

For Pope Benedict, Vatican Council II was a break with Tradition and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc referred to physically visible cases and so objective exceptions for EENS and the traditional ecclesiocentrism.

This is fantasy theology. It is political nonsense.But this was the political line that Pope Benedict wanted the SSPX to accept.It was only then that their Mass could be licit with full canonical recognition.

So for the last two consecutive Sundays in his homily at the St. Catherine of Siena chapel in Rome, the priest has not mentioned Vatican Council II. He has not said that the Council (LG 8 etc) does not contradict 16th century EENS.

Instead like Pope Pius XII he accepts the irrational 1949 Letter of the Holy Office.Like Pope Paul VI he will continue to use the irrational and not rational premise to interpret the Council.-Lionel Andrades

FEBRUARY 6, 2023

For the second consecutive Sunday the SSPX priest in his homily has not mentioned Vatican Council II.

 

For the second consecutive Sunday the SSPX priest at the St.Catherine of Siena chapel in Rome, in his homily at the 10 am Latin Mass has not mentioned Vatican Council II. Last month I e-mailed the SSPX centers inclusing that of Albano, near Rome. I explained that there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II. One is rational and the other is irrational. The SSPX chooses the irrational version. These priests, like the others, at Albano, interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise and inference. So the conclusion is nontraditional. Then they will criticize the Council and not their common false premise.

At this Mass regularly attended by Roberto Fiore and his family, they are interpreting Vatican Council II, irrationally and not rationally.

Fr. Aldo Rossi a former prior of the SSPX in Albano, a few years back told me that there were no visible cases of non Catholics being saved with the baptism of desire (BOD) or in invincible ignorance (II). This is something obvious he said. There were no objective cases. Also some young SSPX priests at that time agreed with him.

However Econe seemed to want to continue to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. Since for Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the SSPX bishops and Pope Paul VI, BOD and II referred to visible and known non Catholics saved outside the Church. So LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II were practical exceptions for the traditional strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), with no known exceptions.

For me BOD and I.I refer to invisible cases but for this priest and the Fiore family it refers to visible cases. So the Council is a break with Tradition for them but not for me.

If the young people who were present at the Mass yesterday morning would interpret the Council rationally like me, then Vatican Council II would not be a break with the dogma EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed.

The SSPX at Albano could then ask Pope Francis, the cardinals and all the bishops in the world, to also interpret the Council rationally and so the conclusion will be conservative.

Rome will then have come back to the Catholic Faith; to the conservative Catholic Faith, as Archbishop Lefebvre wanted. The SSPX priest yesterday  interpreted the Council like the liberals. Last Sunday he could not say that the Council supported the ecclesiology of St. Francis of Sales.

So he keeps liberalism in the Church alive. This is appreciated by the Left.       - Lionel Andrades

 JANUARY 31, 2023

Historic SSPX homily

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/01/historic-sspx-homily.html