Rorate Caeili will not say that Vatican Council II
interpreted with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc being hypothetical only - is not
a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the
Syllabus of Errors.
It is Tradition which is not affirmed by Rorate Caeili
and the SSPX. They continue to interpret
the Council with the Irrational Premise ( invisible cases of LG 8,14 and 16
etc) are visible.
We now know that we can interpret the Council with LG
8,14 and 16 not being a practical exception for the past ecclesiocentrism of
the Church.
The exclusivist ecclesiology of the past is not contradicted by a theoretical and hypothetical LG 8,14 and 16, UR 3, NA
2, GS 22 etc.But priests, liberals and traditionalists are not allowed to
interpret Vatican Council II rationally. Since then there will be no break with
Tradition. They will be affirming Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The Left and the Vatican could suspend them, transfer them or laicize them.
I know of priests who affirmed the strict interpretation
of EENS and once I mentioned it on this blog they feared it would be the end for them as priests. So they reneged on
the faith.
However the issue now is Vatican Council II. The
primary issue is not EENS.
Rorate Caeili, the SSPX and the Lefebvrists in general
are interpreting the Council irrationally to avoid persecution. They are
misleading Catholics. They preserve their interests, their careers, the reputation
of their websites etc.This is unethical and dishonest. It is political.They need to interpret the Council irrationally even when they know that a rational option is possible. -Lionel Andrades
'The Council and The Eclipse’ of God by Don Pietro
Leone: CHAPTER 11 - The Effects of Council Teaching (part 3) regarding: The
Holy Mass, Man, Anti-Realist Subjectivism, The Council’s Subjectivism
https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2023/02/the-council-and-eclipse-of-god-by-don.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment