The SSPX Superior General, bishops and priests want to
please the Jewish Left and the Vatican. They are looking after their careers,
reputation, status, property etc. So they are not rationally interpreting
Vatican Council II and are misleading the faithful. They are not announcing
that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are only hypothetical and
invisible cases in 2023.So these are not references to objective examples of
salvation outside the Catholic Church. They do not contradict the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the past ecclesiocentrism of
the Church. Vatican Council II has the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.
The interpretation of Pope Paul VI and Archbishop
Marcel Lefebvre was irrational and wrong. We now have a rational and
traditional choice.
Also Pope Pius XII and Archbishop Lefebvre overlooked
the mistake in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO). Invisible cases of
the baptism of desire (BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) could
not be visible exceptions for the dogma EENS.
The LOHO was irrational and heretical when it
suggested that not everyone needs to enter the Church for salvation. It was
schism with the pre-1949 Magisterium.
The irrational interpretation of BOD and I.I and the
baptism of blood (BOB) and Vatican Council II (LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc) by
the SSPX is political. They are misleading the Catholics. They are not telling
them the truth about Vatican Council II. -Lionel Andrades
So the SSPX priest to protect himself and the SSPX he will tell the congregation a lie about Vatican Council II. He will call this being prudent.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/so-spx-priest-to-protect-himself-and.html
When the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith punishes Catholics for affirming the traditional strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, it is not Magisterial but political.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/when-congregation-for-doctrine-of-faith.html
Bishop Athanasius Schneider avoids being cancelled
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/bishop-athanasius-schneider-avoids.html
The norm for salvation is Catholic faith and the baptism of water (AG 7, LG 14) and we do not know of any objective cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church. This is the teaching of the Catholic Church today. This was not the teaching of Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Fr. John Hardon, Fr. William Most and Ludwig Ott who interpreted Magisterial Documents with the False Premise.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/the-norm-for-salvation-is-catholic.html
If Bishop Athanasius Schneider uses the Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II he would be saying there are no exceptions in the Council-text for Feeneyite EENS
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/if-bishop-athanasius-schneider-uses.html
The Vatican and the Left will excommunicate/laicize/suspend any priest who affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So they do not allow Vatican Council II to be interpreted rationally. They want the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus to be rejected even though it is Biblical.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/the-vatican-and-left-will.html
No Statement from SSPX Albano.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/no-statement-from-sspx-albano.html
For me Vatican Council II is a legitimate Council.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/for-me-vatican-council-ii-is-legitimate.html
According to Canon Law for the SSPX to be granted canonical recognition they would have to be Catholic and affirm the teachings of the Catholic Church in public. They do not do this.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/according-to-canon-law-for-sspx-to-be.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment