B. Conclusion to the Book
The conclusion to the book as a whole is as follows: The Council has deposed Our Lord Jesus Christ from His Divine Throne, and elected man as God-Man in His place. Man, a body which of itself gives forth no light, but is destined to shine forever in Heaven by reflecting the Uncreated Light of God, has eclipsed that primordial and essential Light of God and shrouded the Heavens and the whole earth in darkness.
Lionel: I have been following the reports/installments from this book over the last two years on Rorate Caeili and have been responding to them. I have also e-mailed the web blog owner. None of my comments posted on my blog and e-mailed to the writer have been acknoweldged or answered.Primarly, Don Pietro Leone interprets Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise like the liberals and Masons. So his book will be appreciated and even allowed to be published. This may not be possible for someone who interprets Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise and returns automatically to Tradition.
Don Petro Leone would also be taking care of his reputation and position in the parish house.They would not ask him to leave.
The book will be appreciated by Cardinal Raymond Burke, Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Prof. Roberto dei Mattei. The ecclesiastics and Lefebvrists, like Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre have to interpret the Council irrationally. They know that the Fake Premise and Inference produces a schismatic and hertical conclusion. This is wrongly attributed to the Council, when the fault lies with the False Premise.But in this way Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider will not be cancelled by Pope Francis.
I choose to interpret the Council rationally and so there is a hermeneutic of continuuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century and the Church Fathers and saints of the Patristic period.
It is the same Vatican Council II before Don Leone and me but our conclusions are radically different since our premise and inferences are different.
1.We can interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as referring to invisible or visible people in 2023 and our conclusiion will be different. If they refer to hypothetical cases only then they do not contradict Feeneyie extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This would be the interpretation of Brother Andre Marie micm and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, traditionalists, at the St.Benedict Center, New Hamsphire.
2.If LG 8 etc refer to physically visible cases in 2013 then they contradict Feeneyite EENS. This would be the interpretation of Brother Thomas Augustine micm, Superior, of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, traditionalists, at the St.Benedict Center, Still River, MA, USA.
This is an issue Don Pietro Leone, perhaps for political reasons, has refused to touch over the last two years. -Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment