Michael Voris and Michael Lofton are not Magisterial when they do not affirm
the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) on the
dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as do the priests of the Society of St. Pius
X(SSPX). So why do they say the SSPX is not Magisterial? Even the pope is not magisterial.
He does not affirm the dogma EENS and neither do Voris and Lofton. This is
schism with the past Magisterium in the 12 th to 16 th centuries.
The SSPX follows the 1962 Missal whose ecclesiology is in harmony with
Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. The new Missal is based upon Vatican
Council II interpreted irrationally. How can this be inspired by the Holy Spirit?
An irrational interpretation of the Council is Magisterial? Voris and Lofton
attend the Novus Ordo Mass with the New Missal, reject the past Councils and
interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. I don’t.
I attend the Novus Ordo Mass, affirm the old Councils, interpret Vatican
Council II rationally and in harmony with the 1962 Missal. So when I attend
the Latin or Novus Ordo Mass in Rome I am not in schism with the Magisterium of
the 12th to 16th century. Voris and Lofton cannot say the
same.
Why should the SSPX accept Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally?
Why must they follow Pope Francis and Michael Voris? It is Cardinal Arthur
Roche who must accept Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. There cannot
be a new Magisterium with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally, with the
common Fake Premise.
So those Catholics who want to follow the Holy Spirit at Mass in Latin
or the vernacular, where can they go? I attend the Novus Ordo Mass in church.
But they cannot go for the Latin Mass in the churches. It is prohibited by Pope
Francis who does not affirm the past Councils, interprets Vatican Council II
irrationally and so is not Magisterial on many subjects of faith and morals. Must the SSPX be obedient to all this ?
Catholics need to find a priest who will offer the Latin Mass with the past
ecclesiology in a private home, school, office etc.The priest can affirm the Council, interpreted rationally, and also Tradition. There is no conflict.
Pope Francis, Michael Voris and Michael Lofton reject Tradition. They have not denied it when I have interacted with them on Twitter.
The pope is expected to be Magisterial. The pope is not magisterial when
he publically interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and rejects the Fourth
Lateran Council and the Council of Florence on extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
These Councils are not contradicted by Vatican Council II interpreted
rationally.
He rejects the Athanasius Creed by interpreting Vatican Council II and
the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally.
This changes the interpretation of the Nicene Creed and the Apostles Creed.
This is first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths (Ad Tuenduem Fidem).This
is an impediment to offering Holy Mass in any Rite. The pope is automatically
excommunicated. He ceases to be pope until he ends the scandal receives
absolution in the Confessional. Now he supports mortal sins of faith.
A pope cannot follow Satan and the Left. Otherwise it is political and
not Catholic.
When Pope Francis chooses to interpret Vatican Council II rationally,
then there is no new Magisterium. He becomes a traditionalist and the whole
Church returns to Tradition. It was Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre who wanted Rome
to come back to the Faith. Pope Francis has simply to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG
16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, rationally – and Rome comes
back to the Catholic Faith. One simple action is needed. Vatican Council II
will have a continuity with the past. - Lionel Andrades
https://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/mvsx-speeding-towards-schism
No comments:
Post a Comment