Church Militant TV needs to update and correct their page on the Society
of St. Pius X(SSPX). I go for Mass at the SSPX chapel in Rome and I interpret
Vatican Council II rationally ( LG 16 are hypothetical only. So
invincible ignorance does not contradict the dogma EENS or the orthodox
passages in CCC 846).
I reject Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally by CMTV and Pope
Francis (For them LG 16, invincible ignorance, are physically visible cases in 1965-2023
and so contradict the orthodox passages in Vatican Council II which support 12th
to 16th century EENS).
I interpret Vatican Council II with a rational premise and inference and so my conclusion is traditional and non heretical. They interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational premise and inference and so their conclusion is heretical and schismatic. The false premise creates a rupture with the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church.
So this is my doctrinal position.
I affirm the old theology of the Council of Florence, Cantate Domino,
1442. Christine Niles rejected Cantate Domino, 1442 when she projected
hypothetical cases of being saved invincible ignorance as being non
hypothetical and objective. She cited the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office in a M’cd
Up program on extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So she cited Cantate
Domino, Council of Florence, in that program and a) did not clarify that the 1949 LOHO, did not have any
exceptions for Cantate Domino.b) Neither did she mention in that program that Vatican Council II and
the Catechism of the Catholic Church do not contradict the Council of Florence on
the traditional interpretation of EENS.
Instead Michael Voris has been
interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally (in a program with Louie
Verecchio etc) and projecting it as a break with Tradition.
I also affirm the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Athanasius Creed. But for CMTV and the Archbishop of Detroit this Creed and the Syllabus is contradicted
by Vatican Council II, irrational. They are obsolete. Neither of them interpret the Council
rationally and so in harmony with Tradition.
Since CMTV interprets Vatican Council II irrationally, LG 8, LG 14, LG
16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are explicit cases, examples of salvation outside
the Catholic Church. So the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q, 27Q) has exceptions
for EENS according to CMTV.
This is irrational, heretical, schismatic and non traditional. It cannot
be the work of the Holy Spirit. It cannot be Magisterial even if this view is
supported by the popes after Vatican Council II.
Michael Voris and Michael Lofton need to clarify that they accept the
Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence, Cantate Domino
(1442) which are not contradicted by Vatican Council II and the Catechism of
the Catholic Church.
In ‘Fr. Feeney’s Strange Doctrines ‘by Jim Russell(ChurchMilitant.com) April
23, 2019)posted on CMTV, Fr. Leonard Feeney
was maligned. He was not obliged to say invisible cases of the baptism of desire
and being saved in invincible ignorance were physically visible for him.
Russell interpreted BOD and I.I in the same irrational way as Pope Pius XII and
the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office. How can invisible people be visible examples of salvation outside the Church in 1949 and exceptions for Feeneyite EENS? This was also the irrational interpretation
of Rahner, Ratzinger, Kung, Murray and Congar in 1965.
So irrespective of CMTV’s views on
Fr. Leonard Feeney the main issue now is Vatican Council II.
1) Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the Council of
Florence etc when LG 8, 14, 16 etc refer to only hypothetical and invisible cases.
2) The baptism of desire and being
saved in invincible ignorance are not objective exceptions for Feeneyite EENS
as mentioned in the 1949 LOHO.
These points need to be clarified by
CMTV.-Lionel Andrade
It cannot be said, ‘to follow Pope Francis is to follow the Magisterium’ since Pope Francis rejects the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence, Cantata Domino (1442) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX when he accepts and interprets Vatican Council II irrationally.
I accept Vatican Council II and I accept Tradition. Michael Voris and Michael Lofton do not accept Vatican Council II ( rational) and they reject Tradition ( Church Councils, Catechisms etc) which are contradicted by their irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, which the SSPX and I reject.
A pope cannot be Magisterial who supports the Boston Heresy. He must correct the error.There are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.
Michael Voris and Michael Lofton are not Magisterial when they do not affirm the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as do the priests of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX). So why do they say the SSPX is not Magisterial?
An Augustinian Recollect priest at the church Sant Ildefonso e Tomasso Villanova, via Sistina, Rome, yesterday agreed with me. He said Vatican Council II has a continuity with the past.
Without the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII, Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits - the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) could interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
The Boston Heresy refers to the public heresy of the popes from Pius XII to Francis. The heresy has infected the whole Church like the Arian heresy of the past. All the cardinals and bishops accept the Boston Heresy of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston.
Wikipedia’s entries on Vatican Council II, extra ecclesiam nulla sales, Fr. Leonard Feeney, Feeneyism, etc reek with the Boston Heresy of the popes from Pius XII to Francis
It is like watering the roots of a plant or tree. With one simple step, one action, the whole tree is nourished-branches, leaves, roots etc.In the same way by choosing the rational premise we return to the past in faith and morals, liturgy,. mission, ecclesiology etc
The understanding of the Apostles' Creed or the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed. has been changed with the Irrational Premise : the Church now teaches that there is known salvation outside the Church
No comments:
Post a Comment