To get a degree in theology from the Angelicum the Dominican sister has to support what is irrational, nontraditional, schismatic and unethical and assume this is Catholic orthodoxy

 

When I told the Dominican Sister yesterday that the baptism of desire (BOD) and invincible ignorance(I.I)  in the 1949  Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston with reference to Fr. Leonard Feeney, referred to an invisible case, so it was Pope Pius XII and Cardinal Cushing who were in heresy and schism and not Fr. Leonard Feeney, this was too much for her. BOD and I.I were not practical exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.This is a discovery when you see through the false narrative on the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.

I told her Fr. Leonard Feeney was only supporting the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442). They defined the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). These Councils did not mention any exceptions. Over the centuries the Church  considered the baptism of desire etc as being invisible and not a practical exception for EENS. This is common sense. They did not have any other choice.The baptism of desire etc is always theoretical for us human beings.

All this goes against the false narrative this Dominican Sister is taught at the Angelicum on Fr. Leonard Feeney, the 1949 LOHO, Vatican Council II etc.

To get a degree in theology from the Angelicum she has to support what is irrational, nontraditional, schismatic and unethical and assume this is Catholic orthodoxy.- Lionel Andrades