The Vatican-Hindu talks failed to be honest and acknowledge that Vatican Council II can only be interpreted rationally. This is being ethical. So the Hindus too must only interpret the Council rationally and honestly. At present they too are dishonest.

 The Vatican-Hindu talks failed to be honest and acknowledge that Vatican Council II can only be interpreted rationally. This is being ethical. So the Hindus too must only interpret the Council rationally and honestly. At present they too are dishonest.

When the Council is interpreted rationally it is traditional and ecclesiocentrism. It says all need faith and baptism for salvation (AG 7, LG 14) from Hell. In a rational interpretation of the Council, LG 8, lG 14, LG 16, UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc would not contradict AG 7 and LG 14 and neither would they contradict CCC 45,846, 1257 etc.But they choose to be dishonest. The issue is financial.

The Hindus also believe in the existence of Hell and demons. They believe that there are ‘rakshasas’ people who have lived an austere and discipline life but have followed the ‘left path’. The left path refers to the path of evil ( it is not a political concept) which takes a person to lower levels of evolution.

For Catholics, the Church teaches that outside the Church there is no salvation (CCC 845, 846) and the baptism of water and Catholic faith are needed for all( with no known exception) for salvation. In Heaven there are only Catholics. They are those people who have followed Jesus in the only Church and have died without mortal sin on their soul.

INDIAN CARDINALS, BISHOPS MISINTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II

Today there is confusion in the Catholic Church in India.Since the cardinals, bishops and priests, interpret LG 8, 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II,  irrationally. They assume that these are visible examples of non Catholics saved in the present times (1965-2023).So they conclude that not everyone needs to enter the Catholic Church for salvation. Non Catholics are saved in their religions with their different beliefs they say. This is the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, which is supported by Pope Francis.

DR.JULES GOMES MISINTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II TOO

Church Militant TV’s Jules Gomes, who posts these reports from Rome, also interprets the Council irrationally. Since this is the policy of  Michael Voris and that of the Archbishop of Detroit.They do this for political left reasons. They follow 'the left path' in politics.

RATIONAL INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II WOULD BE ANTI SEMITIC FOR JULES GOMES

 If they interpreted the Council rationally it would mean that there is no rupture with the dogma EENS.The Council would have a hermeneutic of continuity with the Athanasius Creed and the Catechism of Pope Pius X. They would be saying all Hindus need to accept Jesus in the Catholic Church to avoid Hell. It would be the same for  other non Christians. This would be considered Anti Semitic by the Jewish Left.

 CMTV will lose its tax exempt status. The ADL will demand that Pope Francis and Archbishop Allen Vigneron excommunicate Voris.

So CMTV intentionally interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and deceptively like the bishops in India. The Catholics there are doing the same.

They are supporting blasphemy, heresy and schism and so are the ecclesiastics there. For the bishops their tax exempt status is important.- Lionel Andrades

VATICAN-HINDU TALKS AIM AT BUILDING ‘NEW HUMANISM’

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/vatican-hindu-talks-aim-at-building-new-humanism