Judiciary in New Hampshire must be honest

 

Catholics can no more cite Vatican Council II to project a liberal image. We now know that the Council is ‘rigid’, exclusivist and traditional.

I am following Vatican Council II. A pope cannot out of the blue re-interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and claim the Council contradicts Tradition, in particular the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).So based upon this dishonesty he cannot make radical changes in faith and morals, like, for example, Amoris Laetitia and the Abu Dhabi Declaration.

I am following the Council. I interpret it rationally. It is not a break with Tradition for me.I am not innovating.

So the judge in the Fr. George de Laire-Michael Voris case 1 in New Hampshire, USA must only interpret Vatican Council II rationally. This is being ethical.

This also has a direct bearing on the case.

Fr. Georges de Laire and the Curia in the Diocese of Manchester are interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally. They are also interpreting the baptism of desire etc irrationally. So if they are told to interpret the baptism of desire etc rationally they would have to affirm Fourth Lateran Council (1215), in other words, Feeneyite EENS.The Council would not have any exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. Invisile people cannot be visible examples of salvation outside the Church and objective exceptions for the traditional ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church.

Fr. Laire has issued a Decree of Prohibitions against Brother Andre Marie micm, the Superior of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, at Richmond, New Hampshire. Since, the Slaves affirm Feeneyite EENS which he would be obliged to do also, if he did not interpret Vatican Council II, the baptism  of desire etc , irrationally and dishonestly.But for the false premise, the confusion over what is invisible and visible, he would be a confirmed Feeneyite like those against whom he has issued the Decree.

It may be mentioned that over the centuries the popes and saints( Aquinas, Augustine, Francis of Assisi etc) were Feeneyite. Since it is common sense that the baptism of desire etc are not visible cases on earth. If any one is saved with the baptism of desire etc he would be Heaven and unknown to any one on earth.

Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester and the Curia’s dishonesty is public. They do not deny that they officially interpret Vatican Council II irrationally, as does the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.

The Judiciary in New Hampshire in general must be honest and transparent.- Lionel Andrades

 

1

https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/unionleader.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/f/b2/fb201325-