The SSPX priests and faithful at their chapel in Rome interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. Why should I do the same? The Council can be interpreted rationally and honestly.

 

The priests and laity at the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) chapel in Rome are not affirming the Catholic Faith in public in order to maintain their status, reputation, and worldly interests.

They are not affirming the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the Council of Florence (1442) which did not mention any exceptions.

Neither are they affirming Vatican Council II with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc, as referring to hypothetical and visible cases, which are not objective exceptions for the dogma EENS.

The situation is the same at the Novus Ordo Mass in the rest of the churches and chapels in Rome. This is a denial of the Catholic Faith by even the Auxiliary bishops at the Rome Vicariate.

So the Nicene Creed has been changed and all the Catechisms contradicting each other.

The Oath of Office of the bishop is modernist at the Latin Mass and the Mass in the vernacular. Since the bishop interprets Magisterial Documents with the false premise i.e. invisible people are visible in the present times.

There are two Profession of faith, depending upon which of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II are chosen.

The SSPX is still selling books with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. This is unethical. It is the same at the Vatican offices for ecumenism etc.

The SSPX which expelled Fr. Florien Abrahamowich  for political reasons, is now also not affirming the Catholic faith on Vatican Council II , the Creeds etc, for political reasons.

The SSPX priest and faithful at their chapel in Rome interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. Why should I do the same?

The Council can be interpreted rationally and honestly.- Lionel Andrades