Religious liberty and religious expression

 

I am a Catholic and I am affirming Catholic teachings in Rome and there is so much of hate and opposition from non Christians and so much of fear among Catholics.

Recently Prime Minister Giorgia Melloni said that to accommodate others, Italians must not be expected to give up their religious identity. This was also an op-ed in the daily IL Messaggero (07.07.2023).With reference to what was happening in France, the writer said that Italy has its identity.It is 'white and Christian'.

The op-ed in this newspaper from Rome stated that our religious identity and religious expression, as Christians, and this could mean Catholics, should not be limited and restricted, to accommodate others, who are not Christian.

For me Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite ) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite and not Cushingite) says outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation ( AG 7, LG 14, CCC 845, 846, 1257 etc). This is the Conciliar teaching for me. I interpret all Church Documents rationally. So there is a harmony and continuity with Catholic Tradition.

Why must I interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally to ‘maintain peace’ among    non Christians?

The popes, cardinals and bishops are not interpreting Church Documents rationally. They are Cushingites and I am a Feeneyite.

Cushingism is irrational, nontraditional, heretical, schismatic and dishonest. It is not Catholic. It is a mortal sin of faith when the Creeds, Councils, Catechisms etc have a different meaning, from the original.The liberalism is created by Cushingism.

I am not a traditionalist who rejects Vatican Council II. Since the Council when interpreted rationally is traditional. So I do not have to reject the Council. 

The traditionalists interpret Vatican Council II irrationally, with Cushingism, and then reject the expected non traditional conclusion. They place the blame on Vatican Council II and not their Cushingism.

At the SSPX chapel in Rome they are afraid to affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) in public. They also interpret the baptism of desire (BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) with Cushingism. So BOD and I.I are a rupture with Feeneyite EENS. Since they interpret Vatican Council II also with Cushingism, the Council is a rupture with Feeneyite EENS. For me there is no rupture. Since I interpret Vatican Council II and the BOD and I.I with Feeneyism.Hypothetiocal cases are physically invisible in our human reality. So they cannot be practical exceptions for the historic ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church.

Let me recap: Feeneyism says invisible cases are invisible. So LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are physically invisible cases in 2023.Cushingism says LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc are physically visible cases in 2023. They are physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church in 2023.

The SSPX does not interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism since then they will be opposed by the Jewish Left in Italy and the non Christian police and laity, whom the Left support. When Vatican Council II is Feeneyite is does not contradict EENS, Feeneyite.Also LG 14 and AG 7 in Vatican Council II is in harmony with EENS, Feeneyite.

According to the law, the Italian Constitution guarantees freedom of religious beliefs and freedom of religious expression. There is also a Concordat which says Catholicism is the state religion, it is the historical religion of Italy. There is only one official religion in Italy.

As Catholics, who interpret Vatican Council II, EENS, the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms, rationally, we believe that in Heaven there are only Catholics. They are there with Catholic faith and the baptism of water and without mortal sins on their soul. This is the official teaching of Magisterial Documents interpreted rationally. This is the traditional Magisterial and Apostolic teaching.1

I follow it.

Now I am waiting for my first physical beating for my Catholic faith...-Lionel Andrades

1

 ( John 3:5, Mark 16:16 etc, Vatican Council II ( AG 7, LG 14), Catechism of the Catholic Church ( 845,846,1257), Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27Q),dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Fourth Lateran Council, Council of Florence etc), Dominus Iesus ( 20 etc), Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Notification on Fr. Jacques Dupuis sj (2001) during the pontificate of Pope John Paul II. Note: Feeneyite CCC 847-848 refer to hypothetical cases and so they do not contradict the Feeneyite CCC 845, 846, 1257.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/07/with-feeneyite-instead-of-cushingite.html