Thursday, August 3, 2023

Archbishop Victor Manuel Fernandez is a Cushingite on Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). This is a disqualification for being a Prefect of the Dicastery for Doctrine and the Faith (DDF). Cushingism is opposed to Catholic doctrine and theology.Even Pope Francis is a Cushingite on Magisterial Documents (Creeds, Councils etc). Cushingism cannot be Magisterial.

 Archbishop Victor Manuel Fernandez is a Cushingite on Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). This is a disqualification for being a Prefect of the Dicastery for Doctrine and the Faith (DDF). Cushingism is opposed to Catholic doctrine and theology.Even Pope Francis is a Cushingite on Magisterial Documents (Creeds, Councils etc). Cushingism cannot be Magisterial.

Even Cardinal Ratzinger issued Dominus Iesus and Redemptoris Missio with Cushingism. Ecclesiam Suam of Pope Paul VI was Cushingite and not Feeneyite.

Since Pope Francis is a Cushingite, the kerygma for him is Cushingite without ecclesiocentricism. There is a separation of Jesus from his Mystical Body the Church. Cushingism was a rupture with the dogma EENS.

A Cushingite cannot be a Prefect of the DDF and neither can he be a pope. A College of Cardinals cannot elect a Cushighite as a pope.

The popes, cardinals and saints before 1949 were  Feeneyite. St. Thomas Aquinas, St. Augustine, St. Anthony Mary Claret, St Francis of Assisi... were all Feeneyite  on the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood (BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I).They interpreted BOD, BOB and I.I rationally.

BOD, BOB and I.I were  hypothetical and theoretical cases for them. This is obvious. It is common sense . It is rational

But the popes from Pius XII  to Francis have all been  Cushingite. They were irrational. -Lionel Andrades




JULY 28, 2023

Things have changed in the Church. You can know more tell me that you justify your liberalism with Vatican Council, since I can justify my orthodoxy, also with Vatican Council II

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/07/things-have-changed-in-church-you-can.html

TALKS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II BEING IN HARMONY WITH TRADITION AND THERE BEING TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF THE COUNCIL, ONE IS RATIONAL AND THE OTHER IS IRRATIONAL.

If you are a group of Catholics, liberal or traditionalist, I am willing to speak about this subject. I can present the material on this blog in an orderly way for you to understand quickly what I keep writing about. I available am in Rome ( only Rome) and there is no charge. The information will be given free. It will be illustrated with some graphics and photos.

I am a Catholic and I affirm the teachings of the Catholic Church as I have said often on this blog.

The difference between me and Catholics in general and also the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican,  is that they interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms, Councils etc  irrationally and I am rational.

I choose a rational premise and inference and so my conclusion is traditional.

The presentation could take 20 minutes or less.I will be available to answer questions.I do not have any new theology to offer. I simply avoid an irrational observation and we return to the old theology of the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century at the Latin Mass. This would be the general theology today, which is honest and rational, at every Mass and every Rite. It would have to be the lex orandi.

Please e-mail me at : lionelandrades10@gmail.com

p.s I do not have a telephone contact number and do not travel out of Rome.

ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH      SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA

Lionel Andrades

Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.

 Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?

It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.

Blog: http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/

Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

Twitter : @LionelAndrades1

No comments: