How can there be a pope who chooses to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally in public and expects all the cardinals, bishops and priests to do the same? How can he qualify to be a pope ? He must set an example for all. He must interpret all Church Documents rationally.
Pope Francis as the pope must affirm LG 8,14, 15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as referring to only hypothetical cases. So then they are not practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215).They do not contradict the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( 24Q,27Q), which he must affirm.
Now Pope Francis is changing the interpretation of the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Nicene and Apostles Creed.He does this by confusing what is invisible as being visible. It is is a mortal sin of faith to change the Creeds. He must end the scandal with a public announcement and receive absolution in the Sacrament of Confession.
There are four important points to note which I have mentioned in a previous blog post. They are:-
1. If LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are seen as hypothetical cases always then they are not practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Athanasius Creed, the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X and the rest of Tradition. Invisible cases of LG 8,14,15,16 etc cannot be visible exceptions for EENS.
2. If LG 8,14, 15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical and invisible cases then the Nicene Creed does not change when it states , ‘I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins’. It is a reference to the baptism of water.
But if LG 8,14, 15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to physically visible and objective examples of salvation outside the Church in 1965-2023, then Vatican Council II (irrational) is a rupture with the Nicene Creed. This is how Pope Francis interprets LG 8,14,15,16 etc. There are objective cases of LG 8,14,15,16 etc., for him, which are a rupture with the Nicene Creed. The Creed will means, for him, “ I believe in three or more baptisms ( desire, blood, invincible ignorance etc) which are physically visible and exclude the baptism of desire and so contradict Feeneyite EENS', or, EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442)’.
INTERPRETATION OF CATECHISMS CHANGE
The interpretation of the Catechisms are also changed for him. He changes the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27Q and 29 Q all interpreted irrationally) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( 845,846,1257, 847,848 etc). The Catechisms can be interpreted with Feeneyism (invisible people are invisible) or Cushingism (invisible people are visible).( See below for details)
WE CAN CHOOSE THE HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY WITH TRADITION
3. We now know how to create the hermeneutic of continuity or rupture with Tradition. We choose from either of them.Pope Francis chooses the hermeneutic of rupture.
THERE CAN BE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS
4. There can be two interpretations of Magisterial Documents. They can be interpreted rationally or irrationally. The popes,cardinals and bishops choose the irrational version. So there is the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. I choose the rational option. So there is the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition. Pope Francis wants all Catholics to accept Vatican Council II but only the irrational version. With the irrational version the Council contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
For me Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS.
This is EENS as held by Brother Andre Marie micm, Superior of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire and Brother Peter Dimond, apologist at the Most Holy Family Monastery, New York. The pope, cardinals and bishops cannot say the same.However even Brother Peter Dimond makes on a mistake on the Council which he interprets irrationally and so is a break with Tradition ( EENS etc).
THIS IS A DISCOVERY.
So this is a discovery before the Synod in October where all the participants will interpret Vatican Council II and the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms irrationally and so dishonestly. It will be the same at the ordination of the 21 new cardinals in September.There will 18 of these 21 cardinals who will be allowed to elect a pope. These 18 cardinals like Pope Francis:-
1. Interpret LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc irrationally and not rationally.
2. They also re-interpret the Creeds, Councils, dogma EENS, the baptism of desire and beings saved in invincible ignorance and the Catechisms, irrationally and not rationally.They re-interpret Magisterial Documents irrationally.
3. They choose the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.
This is first class heresy according to the heirarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II ( Ad Tuendem Fidem).They do not have a right to offer Holy Mass. This is a scandal.
According to Canon Law they are juridical persons and so have to affirm the Catholic faith in public to remain in office.
We can further see the error of Pope Francis and the cardinals with these four models.
1. Two Columns.
2. The Red is not an exception for the blue.
3. Feeneyism and Cushingism.
4. Irrational and Rational premise.
Two Columns
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/07/repost-pope-francis-changes-doctrine.html
The Red is not an exception for the Blue
Feeneyism and Cushingism
I am referring to Feeneyism and Cushingism as explained on my blog.The fault does not lie with Vatican Council II in itself. It depends upon how you interpret the Council, whether you use Cushingism or Feeneyism. Cushingism results in the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.
FALSE PREMISE, INFERENCE AND CONCLUSION (GRAPHICS)
When an irrational premise is used I refer to it as Cushingism. When there is a rational premise, I refer to it as Feeneyism.
The mainstream Church , Pope Francis and the cardinals are liberal today because of the fake premise. Let them use a rational premise and the liberalism falls off from the whole Church.
Fake premise
Lumen Gentium 8,Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.
Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.
Fake conclusion
Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Here is my interpretation of Vatican Council II in blue.
Rational Premise
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.
Rational Conclusion
Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine
of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-
IRRATIONAL PREMISE
The irrational premise is that invisible things or persons are visible.
RATIONAL PREMISE
The rational premise is that invisible things or persons are visible.
_______________________
IRRATIONAL PREMISE
The irrational premise is that hypothetical cases are objectively visible in 2021.
RATIONAL PREMISE
The rational premise is that hypothetical cases are objectively invisible in 2021.
___________________________
IRRATIONAL PREMISE
The irrational premise is that the baptism of desire refers to personally known cases in 2021.
RATIONAL PREMISE
The rational premise is that the baptism of desire refers to an unknown cases in 2021.There is no personally known case.
__________________________
IRRATIONAL PREMISE
The irrational premise is assuming there are objectively seen and known cases of being saved in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water in 2016.
RATIONAL PREMISE
The rational premise is assuming others (in general) cannot see invisible cases in the present and the past.It is assuming that the baptism of desire refers to an unknown and invisible case in the present or past.
__________________________________________
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment