Roberto dei Mattei, President of the Lepanto Foundation,
and director of the magazine Radici Cristiane and the news agency Corrispondenza
Romano, was seen at a restaurant yesterday afternoon in Rome.
Mattei continues to not affirm Vatican Council II and
interprets the Council like the dubbia Cardinals and Pope Francis. This is the
political- left line of Alberto Melloni of the FSCIRE for whom the Council has
only a hermeneutic of rupture, with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the
Fourth Lateran Council (1215).
Mattei, who also writes for the SSPX media and does not ask the SSPX to interpret Vatican Council II rationally. He also is not in a position to ask the cardinals at the Synod or his media to interpret the Council rationally, since then he would be accused of being Anti Semitic etc and his media and income will be targeted. Now, he can eat at restaurants comfortable.He keeps quiet on this issue.
If he interpreted the Council rationally like me, he will not be
allowed to hold Conferences. Since not only the Fourth Lateran and he Council of Florence which defined EENS, is declared Feeneyite and Anti
Semitic but also Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) and the Catechism of the
Catholic Church (845, 846, 1257 etc).
So he allows the Synod to get by without pointing out
that cardinals Grech and Hollerich and Sr. Nathalie Bequart have said that the
Synods are based upon Vatican Council II. Cardinal Marx said the same before.
Pope Francis has not denied it. They all mean Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally.
For them LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to physically visible
non Catholics saved in the present time outside the Church without faith and
baptism.This is a new doctrine of Mattei.
So Reuters and the other news agencies say Vatican Council II is a
revolution in the Catholic Church. Even Pope Francis believes Vatican Council II
is a revolution in the Church and so faith, morals, mission, ecclesiology, ecumemism,
inter-religious dialogue etc can be changed by interpreting the Council
deceptive and unethically like prudent Mattei.
Also other media, like those of Michael Voris, Michael Matti and John
Henry Weston are following the same prudent policy when reporting on the
Synods.
The five dubbia cardinals are avoiding being laicized if they interpret Vatican Council II with LG 8 etc referring to hypothetical and invisible cases only.
Yet this is common sense. One does not have to be a
theologian to understand this. But cardinals Burke and Brandmuller in their
second dubbia are careful not to bring out this truth and take the Church back
to Tradition. They have not discussed Vatican Council II rational and
irrational, probably for personal and political reasons.
There is no mention of it in both their dubbias.
Even the SSPX priests at Albano who offer Holy Mass in
Rome do not want to affirm Vatican Council II rational and admit that
Archbishop Lefebvre and the present SSPX bishops made a mistake. LG 8 etc
always refer to invisible cases. The baptism of desire (LG 14) and being saved in
invincible ignorance(LG 16) was never an exception for the Fourth Lateran Council etc.
https://www.robertodemattei.it/il-sinodo-i-dubia-e-il-papa-che-verra/
No comments:
Post a Comment