When I say that other religions are not paths to salvation I am following Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church which are Magisterial and official Church Documents. This is not just a personal view.I choose to interpret them rationally and honestly and expect others to do the same. So a priest or religious sister should not be punished for the doing the same. We are following our Catholic Faith in Rome. We are not traditionalists who reject Vatican Council II ( rational).
MARTYRS DO DIRECTLY TO HEAVEN
I am following Jesus and His Mystical Body the Catholic
Church. If I have to die for this I shall be a martyr in Heaven. Those
Catholics who have to die for doing the same will also be martyrs.
Those Catholics, or non Catholics, who are killed for
helping me will also be martyrs. The Catholic faith does not change. This is
the traditional teachings. Martyrs go directly to Heaven.
I personally chose not to be provocative but when
asked to given an account of my Faith, I must speak the truth. Ad Gentes 7 says
all need faith and the baptism of water for salvation. Lumen Gentium 14 says
all need faith and baptism for salvation. Lumen Gentium 14 is cited in the
Catechism of the Catholic Church under the title Outside the Church there is no
salvation (846). The Church is the only Ark of Noah that saves in the flood
(845). God the Father wants all to be united in the Catholic Church (845).
Hindus, Buddhists, Jews and Muslims do not have the
Catholic Faith. They will be lost forever at the time of death.
The Muslim prophet Muhammad knew about Jesus and yet
he chose not to enter and instead founded a new religion. He is not saved from
Hell according to Lumen Gentium 14.He also died without ‘faith and baptism’ (AG
7).
The Bible says all need the baptism of water with faith,
for salvation (John 3:5).Ad Gentes 7 says ‘all’. Those who do not believe will
be condemned (Mark 16:16). The Church is the narrow gate to Heaven. Jesus says
that the road to Hell is wide and most people take it (Matthew 7:13-14).
MARTYRS IN ROME LIKE THE EARLY CATHOLICS
Catholics in Rome can once again choose to be martyrs
like the Early Christians; the Early Catholics. The level of intolerance here
is not the same as the Diocletian period, but it has risen.
'We have our Faith in Jesus'. This was mentioned by
Cardinal T. Bertone, the former Vatican, Secretary of State in his letter to
the Chief Rabbinate of Israel, who was objecting to The Good Friday Prayer for
the Conversion of the Jews.
POPE JOHN PAUL II CALLED FOR CONVERSION INTO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
Pope John Paul
II also wanted the Jews and the rest of mankind to convert into the Catholic
Church for salvation from Hell. When he visited New Delhi and issued Ecclesia
di Eucharistia, he appealed to all to convert into the Catholic Church. The
Document on the Eucharist says, the Eucharist, the Sacrament, is necessary for
salvation and that Orthodox Christians cannot receive it. They are outside the
Catholic Church.
Pope John Paul II issued a Notification against Fr.
Jacques Dupuis sj. The pope opposed a pluralism of religious belief.
Over the centuries the teachings of the Catholic
Church has been constant and it has been expressed well in the writings of the
saints, like St. John Bosco, St. Maximillian Kolbe and St. Anthony Marie
Claret. His feast day it is today. The doctrines of the Catholic Church today
on exclusive salvation are the same as that of the missionaries and Magisterium
of the 16th century.
So Catholic religious communities in Rome must be readY to follow, and die for, the teachings of the Catholic Church. These teachings have a continuity with the Magisterium over the centuries. It is not just a
hermeneutic of continuity with the past but a hermeneutic of continuity with
the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This was
not known to Pope Paul VI, Rahner, Ratzinger, Congar, Lefebvre, Mattei,
Hildebrand, Davies and the SSPX bishops Fellay, Richardson.It is still not known to the new SSPX
bishops consecrated over the last 25 years.
This is Jesus’ Church. It does not change.
We follow the Bible and not other religious books.
Catholics must not be told that they are ‘terrorists’
or ‘fundamentalists’, in Rome, since they follow the Bible , the Catechism of
the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II. They do this in harmony with
the past Magisterium, including that of the Papal States and the
Austro-Hungarian Catholic Empire.
In Heaven there are only Catholics (AG 7, LG 14, CCC
845, 846, 1257 etc).We do not know of any exception for the dogma EENS. There
are none mentioned in Vatican Council II. Since LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2,
GS 22 etc, refer to only hypothetical cases. We cannot meet or see any one
saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) or the baptism of desire (BOD). Invisible cases of the
BOD and I.I never ever were visible exceptions for the dogma EENS. The 1949
Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard
Feeney made an objective mistake. It is not Magisterial. The Holy Spirit canno make an objective mistake. So Pope Francis and
the cardinals and bishops are not Magisterial, when they interpret Vatican Council II irrationally i.e. they confuse what is
invisible as being visible and then project the conclusion as a break with
Tradition, in particular the dogma EENS.
The National Catechetical Centers are not Magisterial
when they interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the dogma EENS. This is
unethical. We now there is a rational and honest choice. So Vatican Council II
is not a rupture with the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) which did not mention
any exceptions.
The National Bishops Conferences are only Magisterial
when they do not project BOD, I.I etc as being exceptions for the dogma EENS,
Ad Gentes 7, the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845, 846, 1257). The
conferences then are rational, honest and not political. -Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 28, 2023
Alberto Melloni’s FSCIRE (Bologna School) continues to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and unethically and is calling for research papers on Islamism. There is no denial from Melloni and the FSCIRE staff.
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Francesca Cadeddu is a researcher at Alberto Melloni’s FSCIRE.She does not know about Vatican Council II (rational), interprets the Council unethically and writes books on religious illiteracy
SEPTEMBER 24, 2023
So there are no exceptions in magisterial documents to the strict interpretation of the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation, an ecumenism of return and an ecclesiology which supports exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. No magisterial document contradicts traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus. aristandmission.blogspot.com/2023/09/intentionally-fscire-and-european-union.html
THE RED IS NOT AN EXCEPTION FOR THE BLUE
Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it." Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him...- Ad Gentes 7. Vatican Council II
THE RED IS NOT AN EXCEPTION FOR THE BLUE
14. This Sacred Council wishes to turn its attention firstly to the Catholic faithful. Basing itself upon Sacred Scripture and Tradition, it teaches that the Church, now sojourning on earth as an exile, is necessary for salvation. Christ, present to us in His Body, which is the Church, is the one Mediator and the unique way of salvation. In explicit terms He Himself affirmed the necessity of faith and baptism(124) and thereby affirmed also the necessity of the Church, for through baptism as through a door men enter the Church. Whosoever, therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ, would refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not be saved.
They are fully incorporated in the society of the Church who, possessing the Spirit of Christ accept her entire system and all the means of salvation given to her, and are united with her as part of her visible bodily structure and through her with Christ, who rules her through the Supreme Pontiff and the bishops. The bonds which bind men to the Church in a visible way are profession of faith, the sacraments, and ecclesiastical government and communion. He is not saved, however, who, though part of the body of the Church, does not persevere in charity. He remains indeed in the bosom of the Church, but, as it were, only in a "bodily" manner and not "in his heart."(12*) All the Church's children should remember that their exalted status is to be attributed not to their own merits but to the special grace of Christ. If they fail moreover to respond to that grace in thought, word and deed, not only shall they not be saved but they will be the more severely judged.(13*)
Catechumens who, moved by the Holy Spirit, seek with explicit intention to be incorporated into the Church are by that very intention joined with her. With love and solicitude Mother Church already embraces them as her own.- Lumen Gentium 14, Vatican Council II
THE RED IS NOT AN EXCEPTION FOR THE BLUE
THE RED IS NOT AN EXCEPTION FOR THE BLUE
Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848
"Outside the Church there is no salvation" 846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers? Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:
- Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.
- Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation.
-Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848
THE RED IS NOT AN EXCEPTION FOR THE BLUE
DOMINUS IESUS
________________________________
THE RED IS NOT AN EXCEPTION FOR THE BLUE
Now, among those things which the Church has always preached and will never cease to preach is contained also that infallible statement by which we are taught that there
is no salvation outside the Church.
However, this dogma must be understood in that sense in which the Church herself understands it. For, it was not to private judgments that Our Savior gave for explanation those things that are contained in the deposit of faith, but to the teaching authority of the Church...
which is the Church, and to remain united to Christ and to His Vicar, through whom He Himself in a visible manner governs the Church on earth...
Therefore, no one will be saved who, knowing the Church to have been divinely established by Christ, nevertheless refuses to submit to the Church or withholds obedience from the Roman Pontiff, the Vicar of Christ on earth.
Not only did the Savior command that all nations should enter the Church, but He also decreed the Church to be a means of salvation without which no one can enter the kingdom of eternal glory.
In His infinite mercy God has willed that the effects,necessary for one to be saved, of those helps to salvation which are directed toward man's final end, not by intrinsic
necessity, but only by divine institution, can also be obtained in certain circumstances when those helps are used only in desire and longing. This we see clearly stated in the Sacred Council of Trent, both in reference to the sacrament of regeneration and in reference to the sacrament of penance (, nn. 797, 807).
However, this desire need not always be explicit,as it is in catechumens; but when a person is involved in invincible ignorance God accepts also an implicit desire, so called because it is included in that good disposition of soul whereby a person wishes his will to be conformed to the will of God.
SEPTEMBER 23, 2023
Ursula von der Leyden who has been accused of plagiarism in the past is now interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and unethically and there is no denial from Alberto Melloni, Secretary of the FSCIRE (Bologna School) and neither from the Cardinal-Archbishop of Bologna, Matteo Zuppi
SEPTEMBER 21, 2023
Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Union and Alberto Melloni, Director of the FSCIRE are still interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally. This is unethical.It is deceptive.
SEPTEMBER 17, 2023
Alberto Melloni (FSCIRE- Bologna School) and Ursula Von Leyden in this video are interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and unethically
SEPTEMBER 13, 2023
All the books on Vatican Council II written by Alberto Melloni, of the FSCIRE and those published by the SSPX’s Angelus Press, are authored with the irrational and not rational premise. There is no denial from the FSCIRE or the SSPX.
SEPTEMBER 24, 2023
Intentionally the FSCIRE and the European Union choose a false premise and inference. This is even after they are informed.
Euractiv Italia | EURACTIV Italia
Alberto Melloni and the FSCIRE correspondents and staff agree with me. The FSCIRE and the European Union have been interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally i.e. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, do not refer to hypothetical and invisible cases in 1965-2023 for them. They are physically visible cases. Only in this way they can be made exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). So for the FSCIRE and EU , LG 8,14,15,16 etc, are objective examples of salvation outside the Church and are practical exceptions for the dogma EENS. This is irrational and it is their mistake.There are no denials or clarifications from the FSCIRE. For me LG 8 etc refer to invisible cases. This is common sense. They are not objective exceptions for the dogma EENS, for me.
The FSCIRE and the European Union have all these years interpreted LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc as being physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church. This was their false premise. So they inferred that these cases were practical exceptions for the dogma EENS, which had become obsolete. This was their irrational premise and inference.It was irrational and unscientific.
For me LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, GS 22 etc, refer to hypothetical cases only. They cannot be physically visible in 1965-2023.If anyone is saved outside the Catholic Church it could only be known to God. We cannot say that any particular person has been saved or will be saved with the baptism of desire (LG 14) and invincible ignorance (I.I). No one saw St. Emerentiana in Heaven without the baptism of water.
So for me, Vatican Council II does not mention any exceptions for the dogma EENS and the Athanasius Creed, which says all need the Catholic faith for salvation. Vatican Council II has the hermeneutic of continuity with the Syllabus of Errors and the Catechisms of Pope Pius X and Trent. The Councils supports the past exclusivist ecclesiology. There is no rupture with the ecclesiocentrism of the missionaries of the 16th century.
The interpretation of Vatican Council II by the FSCIRE (Bologna School) is now obsolete.It is political.It is not Catholic. It is unethical. Since intentionally the FSCIRE chooses a false premise and inference. This is even after they are informed.
Vatican Council II has to be interpreted only rationally and so there cannot be a New Theology, New Ecumenism, New Ecclesiology, New Evangelization and New Canon Law. Since this New Theology is based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and this is dishonest. The New Theology separates Jesus from the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation.It does this with alleged exceptions for EENS.
But now we know that the Council no more has exceptions for the dogma EENS. So there no more is a separation ( when speaking about salvation) between Jesus and the Catholic Church. Membership in the Catholic Church is needed for salvation.It is not enough to believe in Jesus, according to the Christian denonominations.
So how can Alberto Melloni and the European Union, with their books, articles and reports on Vatican Council II, project the Council as a break with Tradition and then give the green light for liberalism, like homosexual unions?
Vatican Council II is no more ‘a revolution’ in the Church but a continuation with Tradition. The Ratzinger liberal theology made a mistake. It had its foundation upon the error in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston. This Letter, projected invisible cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance, as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. This remained the error of the popes from Pius XII to Francis and the European Union and Alberto Melloni follow it. All the reports and videos on the Vatican website follow this mistake.This is being tacitly acknowledged by Alberto Melloni. - Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/09/intentionally-fscire-and-european-union.html
No comments:
Post a Comment