Even Bradley Eli, Christine Niles and others at Church Militant TV do not meet the ‘morality’ requirements when they choose to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and deceptively, like Pope Francis, and then call it the Magisterium. How can Vatican Council II interpreted with a fake premise be Magisterial? Why don't they resign?
They do not affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. They also interpret Vatican Council II irrationally for CMTV's tax exempt status.
Since they cannot interpret the Council rationally, for political and other reasons, they too could resign.
The deception is public and it is a scandal.
Secondly, Church Militant was founded by Michael Voris. It belongs to him. If they found something objectionable, then in good conscience they could have resigned, and allow Michael Voris to handle it.
- Lionel Andrades
____________________
APRIL 10, 2023
Bradley Eli chooses deception. No ‘expose’ of CMTV by Christine Niles
Bradley Eli chooses deception. No ‘expose’ of CMTV by Christine Niles
Bradley Eli and Church Militant TV (CMTV) have been saying that they follow the Magisterium. How can it be magisterial to interpret Church Documents irrationally and produce liberalism in the Church, which was not there before 1949?
They are not letting the people know that Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally and the whole Church returns to Tradition immediately.
They themselves do not want to return to Tradition. They want to maintain good relations with the Left and the Vatican. This will not be possible if they affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) according to the 12th to 16 th century Catholic Church.
So they will vaguely criticize Vatican Council II and not enter into theology. Since it will expose them as being heretics and schismatics. This is the result of the fake premise and inference.The whole Church is political and fallowing.
There is no ‘expose’ of this deception by Christine Niles nor is this ‘one of the lies and falsehoods’ Michael Voris wants ‘to trap’.
Upon exclusive salvation in the Church depends the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King, traditional mission and the non separation of Church and State.So the Left don't want it.
CMTV has a specific problem which can be recognized in public.Since if LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2 GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II, refer to hypothetical cases only, then they are traditionalist.They are conservative Catholics.
If Lumen Gentium 8 etc refer to physically visib le examples of salvation outside the Church in 1965-2023, then they are liberals. The de fide teachings on exclusive salvation, of the past, are obsolete.
There is no decision on this issue from Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj and the popes all these years.Since they were political and so dishonest and deceptive. This was not Catholic.The present interpretation of Vatican Council II is not Catholic.They are choosing to use the fake premise to produce a non traditional conclusion.
The New Evangelisation of Pope Francis, Cardinal Tagle and Archbishop Rino Fisichella is Christocentric and not also Ecclesiocentric.The false premise blocks out the traditional ecclesiocentrism.It produces the political rupture with Tradition.Then it is possible for the liberals to have the New Ecumenism, New Theology, New Evangelisation, New Ecclesiology, New Canon Law etc. Even the traditionalists and sedevacantists follow the fake interpretation of Vatican Council II and not the rational option.They are not aware of the rational option.
Cardinal Ladaria has been promoting this error through the International Theological Commission, since the time of Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger. He needs to announce that extra ecclesiam nulla salus today is the same as it was for the missionaries and Magisterium, of the 16th century.Then the bark of Peter rights itself.
CMTV should contact Cardinal Ladaria and ask him the right questions. Of course, this is only if CMTV wants to be Catholic and not politically correct on Vatican Council II. -Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment