The mainline Catholic Church has lost the Faith because they interpret Vatican Council II politically i.e. irrationally. If they re-interpret the Council rationally the Church once again is in harmony with Unam Sanctam of Pope Boniface VIII which defined the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation

 

The mainline Catholic Church has lost the Faith because they interpret Vatican Council II politically i.e. irrationally. If they re-interpret the Council rationally the Church once again is in harmony with Unam Sanctam of Pope Boniface VIII which defined the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation (extra ecclesiam nulla salus-EENS).

The Parish Priests and the Rome Vicariate interpret Vatican Council II, irrationally, purposefully, to please the police, who are enforcing the Leftist agenda, within the Catholic Church.

This is not Magisterial.

It was Pope Boniface who founded the La Sapienza University, Rome where today they interpret Vatican Council II, deceptively. They are academically unethical, at the university’s Jurisprudence Department, for example.

Catholic in the pews do not know that LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to only hypothetical cases, always. They refer to invisible people in 2023.So LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc, are not practical exceptions for the dogma EENS of Pope Boniface in Unam Sanctam.

La Sapienza follows the general ‘fanaticism of the Left’, the ‘extremism of the Left’ and so does Pope Francis, the cardinals and bishops.

The political Left, within and outside the Church, will demand that a Parish Priest be transferred , laicized or excommunicated , if he interprets  Vatican Council II rationally ( i.e. invisible cases of LG 8, 15, 16 etc are always invisible) in harmony with Tradition. It is obligatory, politically,  to present Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition-even though it is not.

The La Sapienza University, like the Dominican, pontifical university-the Angelicum, in Rome, has to interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc, as referring to objective, visible, non Catholics in 1965-2023, saved outside the Catholic Church, without Catholic faith and the baptism of water. This is irrational. There are no such visible cases. If anyone was saved as such it would only be known to God.

But they have to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally, by confusing what is invisible as being visible. Only in this way they can create alleged exceptions for Unam Sanctam of Pope Boniface VIII, the Syllabus  of Errors of  Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of Pope  Pius X ( 24 Q).

 The seminarians of the North American College, Rome, have to study with this political ruse, at the Angelicum, the University of St. Thomas Aquinas, Rome. Consecrated students, men and women, accept this error at the Angelicum. To change the Catholic faith, in its Creeds, Catechisms etc is a mortal sin of faith. The Creeds cannot be changed for political reasons.

The Dominicans act as if all is normal. In good or bad conscience they go along with the lie. Propaganda Fide, Vatican, pays for their free tuition, board and lodging in Rome.

The faculty keep their teaching-right. They are allowed to stay on as they teach a leftist approved version of Church history, a political ecclesiology of the Catholic Church and generally a foreign faith.

This is possible, largely, by confusing what is invisible as being visible and then producing the hermeneutic of rupture and not continuity with the past.

I can interpret Vatican Council II rationally, what is invisible is only invisible for me. So Vatican Council II has a continuity with the traditional teaching on exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church. So there is a return to the traditional mission of the 16^th century of the Jesuits. There is a natural return to the missionary doctrines of St. Francis Xavier, St. Robert Bellarmine and St. Ignatius of Loyola. The Church is ecclesiocentric once again, by simply interpreting invisible cases as being invisible.

- Lionel Andrades