Nicole Winfield of the Associated Press and Phillip Pullela of Reuters should stop referring to Vatican Council II as a devolution in the Church, since, when LG 8,14,1,5,16,UR 3, NA ,2 GS 22 etc, are interpreted as physically visible cases only ; hypothetical only; which exist only in our mind, in 2024, Vatican Council II does not have any practical exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X, the Syllabus of Errors and the rest of Tradition.

 

Nicole Winfield of the Associated Press and Phillip Pullela of Reuters should stop referring to Vatican Council II as an evolution in the Church, since, when LG 8,14,1,5,16,UR 3, NA ,2 GS 22 etc, are interpreted as physically visible cases only ; hypothetical only; which exist only in our mind, in 2024, Vatican Council II does not have any practical exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X, the Syllabus of Errors and the rest f Tradition.

Wikipedia also needs to correct its reports on Vatican Council II, Feeneyism, extra ecclesiam nulla salus etc.

Fr. Leonard Feeney denied the existence of visible cases of the baptism of desire. There are none in our reality.

He was also not obliged to go to Rome to defend himself since he was not saying anything new. The innovation was being made by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (Holy Office) with alleged visible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.

The Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the other Councils which defined EENS did not mention any exceptions.  -Lionel Andrades