70,000 religious sisters gave up their vocation after Vatican Council II: Pope Paul VI and Pope John XXIII interpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, irrationally producing a nontraditional conclusion.

 

It is said that some 70,000 religious sisters gave up their vocation in the first 25 years of Vatican Council II (irrational). It was not known to them, and to the priests, who gave up their vocation, that Pope Paul VI had interpreted LG 8, LG 14, LG 15, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, irrationally and that Pope John XXIII had interpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office, irrationally.

Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member...- Letter of the Holy Office 1949

https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/letter-to-the-archbishop-of-boston-2076

 So the conclusion was nontraditional, heretical, schismatic and dishonest. It was a different Catholic Church. The 1949 LOHO projects invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as being physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church and so practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, which is made obsolete.

Since the dogma EENS was made obsolete it was said that there is a new theology in the Church it says outside the Church there is salvation. It was said that there is a new ecclesiology in the Church and so faith, morals and mission was open to change. Everything could be changed. So we were given Amoris Laetitia, Traditional Custode, Fiducia Supplicans etc.

 We can now correct their mistake. The mistake in the 1949 LOHO is being followed by liberals and traditionalists. They also interpret Vatican Council II, confusing what is invisible as being visible and consider this magisterial.

- Lionel Andrades