Catholics avoid Anti Semitic charge and remain politically correct with the Left

Whether I am correct or wrong, whether you like me or not – Lumen Gentium 16 is not a defacto exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).Everyone agrees with me here.There are no objective cases of non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church in invincible ignorance, through no fault of their own and with a good conscience.

Whatever you may think of Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston, there are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire to contradict Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).

 Are there physically visible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church without Catholic faith and the baptism of water in 2024? 

Can we objectively see people saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of water? No!

NATIONAL CATHOLIC REPORTER

So when the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St.Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA say outside the Church there is no salvation- the Feeneyite version, are there any practical exceptions known to the correspondents of the National Catholic Reporter, EWTN, National Catholic Register and Remnant News? No. There are none.

Yet today the Rome Vicariate has still placed a ban on the missionary magazine of the Franciscans of the Immaculate, Christ to the World (Christo al Mondo).The Franciscans said that the Catholic Church has not retracted the dogma EENS.

 But the Rome Vicariate and the Vatican have reneged on the Faith. For them Lumen Gentium 16 is a rupture with the dogma EENS. For them there are explicit cases of LG 16.But it is common knowledge, that invisible people cannot be objective exceptions for the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the rest of Tradition, which is made obsolete with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally i.e confusing what is implicit and being explicit.

Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall have said that there are literal cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14), it is always explicit and never implicit. There are ‘zero cases’ in our human reality since John Martignoni, the American apologist. The BOD and I.I exist only on paper wrote Ann Barnhardt.

DECREE ISSUED FOR NOT ACCEPTING IRRATIONAL INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II AND THE CATECHISM 

Yet Fr. Georges de Laire , the Judicial Vicar in the diocese in New Hampshire has issued a Decree of Prohibitions against the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary for holding the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS and not confusing what is invisible as being visible.

Other religious communities in New Hampshire are being coerced to interpret Lumen Gentium 16 irrationally, for political reasons, by the Diocese of Manchester.

JESUS IS ANTI-SEMITIC FOR THEM

Meanwhile Jewish Left organizations threaten Catholics with Anti Semitism laws. They will be accused of being Anti Semitism fi they uphold Jesus’ teaching in the Bible (John 3:5, Mark 16:16) on the Church, Jesus’ Mystical Body, being the only means of salvation. So it could be Anti-Semitic for Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr.Taylor Marshall to interpret Lumen Gentium 16 and Vatican Council II rationally. So they avoid it for political reasons. They don’t want the same treatment given to Robert Sungenis and Bishop Richard Williamson. So in an interview with Steve Bannon, Bishop Athanasius Schneider interpreted Lumen Gentium 16 as break with Tradition. This pleases the liberals and the Left. When the Decree of Prohibitions was issued against the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire, they kept silent in public. They could not support the St. Benedict Center on doctrine. They were following the acceptable New Theology which says outside the Church there is known salvation, there are visible exceptions for the baptism of desire( LG 14) and being saved in invincible ignorance ( LG 14) etc.

FR.GEORGES DE LAIRE AVOIDS AN INTERVIEW AND ANTI SEMITIC CHARGE

When Michael Voris was in New Hampshire to interview Brother Andre Marie micm, Prior of the St. Benedict Center, NH, he asked Fr. Georges de Laire for an interview. Fr. Laire refused. This was expected. How could Fr. Laire admit that the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston made a mistake? The 1949 LOHO confused invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as being visible exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). Laire has to accept the error in the 1949 LOHO to avoid being Anti Semitic and be charged under some Leftist law by an activist judge in New Hampshire or elsewhere.

So Fr. George de Laire interprets Vatican Council II ( LG 16) irrationally and issues a Decree of Prohibitions against the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire for not doing the same. He is supported by the Vatican and the Jewish Left and is not accused of being Anti Semitic.

BISHOP LIBASCI IGNORES DOCTRINAL STATEMENT

Fr. Georges de Laire and Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA could not dare comment on the Doctrinal Statement of Brother Andre Marie micm,posed on their community website Catholicism.org, since then they would exposed.

Similarly Damien and Simcha Fisher in New Hampshire do not explain in detail why is the St. Benedict Center a sect, for them, since then their irrational theology and philosophy would be exposed.

WHY SHOULD THE SBC INTERPRET CCC 847-848 IRRATIONALLY?

Why should the St. Benedict Center project the Catechism of the Catholic Church 847-848 on being saved in invincible ignorance, as an explicit and objective example of salvation outside the Catholic Church in 1965-2024? 

Why must they project this ‘irrational interpretation ‘of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church by Archbishop Augustine di Noia, Secretary of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, and producde a break with the dogma EENS and the rest of Tradition?

Don’t expect any answers from Simcha and Damien Fisher, two Jewish Left representatives in New Hampshire, alleged Catholics.

Don’t expect any answers from Bishop Peter Libasci and Fr. Georges de Laire since they are looking after their religious and political careers. 

It has been the same with Bishop Bernard Fellay and the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) bishops and priests. They do not want to be Anti-Semitic on the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. So the traditionalists remain politically correct with the Left like the liberal Catholics in New Hampshire.

- Lionel Andrades