Cindy Wooden, Fr. Georges de Laire and Brother Andre Marie micm, are all Feeneyites on extra ecclesiam nulla salus when Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally by them

 

Vatican Council II can only be interpreted rationally. This is the only ethical option available. So Fr. Georges de Laire is a Feeneyite on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus like Brother Andre Marie micm and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in New Hampshire , USA.

 The correspondents of the National Catholic Reporter can only be 'progressive' if they interpret Vatican Council II irrationally, dishonestly and so non traditionally. There is no more support for their liberalism when Vatican Council II is interpreted honestly. There automatically is a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.

The line in purple is important. It decides if Vatican Council II is traditional or liberal.

When Fr. Georges de Laire interprets hypothetical cases as just being hypothetical in Vatican Council II, then there are no practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, mentioned in the text of Vatican Council II.

All the religioius communities, parish priests and rectors can interpret invisible cases of LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2 etc in Vatican Council II as not being objectively visible exceptions for the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation or Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.There is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict Ad Gentes 7 or the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845,846 Outside the Church there is no salvation).

- Lionel Andrades