Fr.John Zuhlsdorf still uses the LOHO irrational reasoning to misinterpret Vatican Council II and EENS

 

SUNDAY, MARCH 25, 2018

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf still uses the LOHO irrational reasoning to misinterpret Vatican Council II and EENS

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf interprets Vatican Council II and the dogma with the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO) irrational reasoning and so hypothetical cases are considered known people saved outside the Church and are allegedly examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church.This was the new fantasy reasoning of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO).

So for Fr.John Zuhlsdorf Dismas the Good Thief,  who allegedly went to Heaven without the baptism of desire would be a known exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS ) in 2018. This is LOHO reasoning.

An invisible person in 2018 is an example of salvation outside the Church for him. He is an exception to all needing to enter the Church for salvation.This is the LOHO reasoning of those who do not want to affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EEN.

Whom do we know in 2018 who will be a Dismas or is a Dismas. Even if there was a person saved outside the Church, it would not be known to us. So it is irrelevant to Feeneyite EENS.

But for Fr.Zuhlsdorf invisible and hypothetical cases mentioned in Lumen Gentium, Vatican Council are concrete and known examples of salvation outside the Church and so contradict Feeneyite EENS for him. He is a liberal.

LOHO is heretical. Since its philosophy says there are invisible people who are visible and they are not Catholics. The theology says these 'visible' non Catholics are saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water. So the conclusion is that not every one needs to be incorporated into the Catholic Church as a member.There is known salvation outside the Church.

Fr.Zuhlsdorf is a Cushingite like Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria and the rest at Ecclesia Dei today.

In his report on Dismas today he does not mention EENS however Dismas is often cited as an exception to Feeneyite EENS.

In the past Fr. Zuhlsdorf has criticized Fr.Leonard Feeney for his 'hard line position' on EENS since  Fr. Zuhlsdorf accepts the irrational reasoning of LOHO and also wrongly interprets Vatican Council II with this reasoning.

-Lionel Andrades

1.

25 March – Feast of the Thief who “stole heaven”: St. Dismas

http://wdtprs.com/blog/2018/03/25-march-feast-of-the-thief-who-stole-heaven-st-dismas/

_______________________________

FEBRUARY 9, 2015

The Letter of the Holy Office is irrational and has no magisterial precedent for this new doctrine

There have been many comments on ASK FATHER: Salvation “outside” the Church by Fr.John Zuhlsdorf (Feb.5,2015) and links have been provided by commentators to support Fr.Z.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/the-letter-of-holy-office-is-irrational.html

FEBRUARY 9, 2015

Response to Fr.John Zuhlsdorf's article on extra ecclesiam nulla salus

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf interprets Vatican Council II with Marchetti's theory so the Council for him is ambigous and a break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus-1

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/frjohn-zuhlsdorf-interprets-vatican.html

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf interprets Vatican Council II with Marchetti's theory so the Council for him is ambigous and a break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus - 2

http://eucharistandssion.blogspot.it/2015/02/frjohn-zuhlsdorf-interprets-vatican_8.html

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf interprets Vatican Council II with Marchetti's theory so the Council for him is ambigous and a break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus - 3

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/frjohn-zuhlsdorf-interprets-vatican_9.htmlhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/response-to-frjohn-zuhlsdorfs-article.html

_____________________

FEBRUARY 10, 2015

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf made an objective mistake : irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/frjohn-zuhlsdorf-made-objective-mistake.html

FEBRUARY 10, 2015

What about the dogma on salvation which has 'evolved' for Fr.Zuhlsdorf ?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/what-about-dogma-on-salvation-which-has.html

FEBRUARY 10, 2015

Extra ecclesiam nulla salus is linked to Vatican Council II. Louie Verrechio and Fr.Zuhlsdorf have still to discover it.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/extra-ecclesiam-nulla-salus-is-linked.html

MARCH 17, 2015

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf does not believe in the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus : advice on interfaith marriages

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/frjohn-zuhlsdorf-does-not-believe-in.html

Vatican/Vicariate is not allowing priests in Rome to interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism : incardìnation prohibition

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/06/vaticanvicariate-is-not-allowing.html

OCTOBER 1, 2015

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf is in material heresyhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/10/frjohn-zuhlsdorf-is-in-material-heresy.html

NOVEMBER 17, 2015

Fr.Zuhlsdorf defends not giving the Eucharist to Lutherans , but does this without any reference to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/11/frzuhlsdorf-defends-not-giving.html