At the time 17:11 on this video Fr.
Robinson cites the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of
Boston which tells us that physically invisible cases of the baptism of
desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are physically visible examples
of salvation outside the Catholic Church and so are practical exceptions for
the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
of the Church Councils (1215,1442 etc) , which did not mention any exceptions.
This was supposed to be 'the nuanced' new teaching of the Church which
contradicted the traditional Feeneyite, dogmatic version, which Fr. Robinson
also says is de fide.
Why should Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St.
Benedict Centers have said that invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved invincible ignorance were visible exceptions for the traditional strict
interpretation of EENS, that of the Council of Florence and the Fourth Lateran
Council ?
Why should they accept a new doctrine on
salvation which is also irrational, heretical, non traditional and dishonest ?
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment