Sedevacantists assume that the baptism of desire is explicit and known to us and so is an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So they assume that the SSPX is heretical because they reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
The Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) also take it for granted that the baptism of desire etc is explicit. They also accept it as an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. However in the SSPX Chapter statement (July 19,2012) they have clarified that there is no salvation outside the Church and there are also no exceptions.
The MHFM in this video do not realize that the baptism of desire is irrelevant to the dogma. There are no known exceptions to the defined dogma.
So even if Archbishop Lefebvre says that a non Catholic can be saved in another religion it does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.One can hold implicit baptism of desire alongwith the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney.
When the Church Councils defined the dogma they were aware of implicit desire and invincible ignorance mentioned by the Church Fathers.It does not contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction.
The Dimond brothers in the video believe it would contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction since for them implicit desire etc is explicit.
The Dimond brothers do not realize that to reject the baptism of desire of the Council of Trent is also heresy.
With this error they reject Vatican Council II as modernist Council and call the Catholic Church a sect.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment