How long before Bishop Bernard Fellay discovers that the Council without the visible dead saved error is traditional and not an issue?
The Council must be accepted only in agreement with the Syllabus of Errors, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) 1.
Vatican Council II does not contradict St.Robert Bellarmine.
The community of traditionalists in Worcester,USA affirm Vatican Council II. SInce it is in agreement with Tradition. The Society of St.Pius X ( SSPX ) could make an announcement that Vatican Council II can be interpreted as a continuation with extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors and Tradition.
If there are other reasons why the SSPX is not given canonical status it is understandable.However it should not be said that the reason is Vatican Council.Vatican Council II without the explicitly known cases of the dead saved theory, agrees with the SSPX position on other religions. It agrees with AG 7 and LG 14 which LG 16,LG 8, NA etc are not explicit exceptions to AG 7 and LG 14.
Vatican Council II instead, does not agree with the position of Archbishops Gerhard Muller and Augustine Di Noia on other religions.
Without the visible dead error, Vatican Council II is also contrary to the doctrines of the New Evangelisation.
It is a continuation with the past, when there is no irrational premise.
Without the irrational premise the Council is in agreement with the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary on other religions. This community of traditionalists have been granted canonical status ahead of the SSPX.
SSPX bishops and priests please contact the bishops of Worcester and Manchester and the Archbishop of Los Angeles, and ask them the following two questions.
1. Do we know in the year 2012 any one saved in invincible ignorance, the baptism of desire, a good conscience, seeds of the word (AG 7), imperfect communion with the Church ?
2. If we do not know any of these cases in 2012 can they be considered exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors?
The Slaves of the Heart of Mary in Los Angeles cannot be recognized by the Church since the Archbishop's Office assumes that the baptism of desire is an explicit exception to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. In other words, in Los Angeles they can see the dead saved with the baptism of desire.These known cases on earth; known to them, are explicit exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma held by the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.-Lionel Andrades
1.
Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door.-Ad Gentes 7,Vatican Council II
Basing itself upon Sacred Scripture and Tradition, it teaches that the Church, now sojourning on earth as an exile, is necessary for salvation. Christ, present to us in His Body, which is the Church, is the one Mediator and the unique way of salvation. In explicit terms He Himself affirmed the necessity of faith and baptism(124) and thereby affirmed also the necessity of the Church, for through baptism as through a door men enter the Church. -Lumen Gentium 14, Vatican Council II.
Father Leonard Feeney 's community celebrates the Year of the Faith:model for SSPX
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment