Tuesday, April 5, 2016

The Traditional Latin Mass is being made subservient to Leftist political ideology

Liturgy is being made subservient to political necessity.The two popes like the SSPX and  the Franciscans of the Immaculate have to accept the new theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.It indicates there are known cases of the baptism of desire etc which are objective exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the  traditional Feeneyite interpretation.
If the SSPX and the Franciscans of the Immmaculate interpret Vatican Council II without this irrational premise, the Council will be in harmony with the 16 century interpretation of EENS. This would be objectionable to the two popes and the political Left which controls Catholic theology.

Since it would result in Catholic school children affirming the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS in harmony with Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite version).It would also mean at the pontifical universities in Rome there would be no known exceptions to the old ecclesiology.The centuries old ecclesiology based on strict EENS.This would mean Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) would be saying all Jews and Muslims need to formally enter the Church with no exception, to avoid Hell.Also there would be no exceptions in Vatican Council II to EENS.  So

the Vatican and Vicariate in Rome are not allowing priests in Rome to interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism and then offer Holy Mass.
Instead it is obligatory to use irrational Cushingism, the Marchetti-Cushing  theology, to interpret the Council.They have to offer Mass with heresy.
Using Cardinal Marchetti's inference, which is non traditional and unreal, is compulsory for all priests in Rome. This is a requirement set for incardination. It has the approval of the liberal rabbis in Italy, Segno and Lara, the Jewish ADL and the Chief Rabbinate of Israel.
Lay Catholics are unaware that if a priest is to be incardinated in Rome, the Vicariate will expect him to say that every one does not need to enter the Church in 2015 since there are known exceptions to the rigorist interpretation of the dogma .It is obligatory for him to say that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are exceptions to all needing to convert into the Church; all needing to be formal members of the Church, to avoid Hell.These are the liturgical requirements for a priest for every rite.
The Vatican and all pontifical institutions are being threatened with leftists laws. So to avoid litigation and tension all priests, including those who offer the Traditional Latin Mass have to use the Marchetti inference to interpret Vatican Council II according to the Vatican's instructions.
Related image
Professors of theology like Dr.Joseph Shaw, John Lamont and Thomas Pink use the Marchetti model to interpret Vatican Council II. They have received the mandatum to teach theology only because they use Marchetti's model.There is no objection from Bishop Athansius Schneider.
Similarly Prof. Robert de Mattei, Corrado Gnerre, Fr.Francesco Giordano and others in Italy, also use the Marchetti model to interpret Vatican Council II.They would not  intepret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.They would not be allowed to teach.

Any one who studies theology, salvation theology ( soteriology), at a Vatican approved university or seminary, has to use the Marchetti irrationality to interpret the dogma and Vatican Council II.
They can attend/offer the Traditional Latin Mass, but only  with the new ecclesiology, since it is official and obligatory.
So when bishops like even the good Athanasius Schneider want the TLM with political correctness it is a bad example for the young people. He remains in full communion with the Church only because he does not use Feeneyism as a theology, when offering the Traditional Latin Mass.
Traditionalists need to identify the cause of the old ecclesiology.Ecclesiology should not be identified with the Mass. It is independent of the Mass.
There can be the old ecclesiology based on the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So with this old ecclesiology a Catholic can attend Mass knowing that the Church teaches that Jews and other non Catholics need to convert for salvation.
While there can be Catholics who attend the Traditional Latin Mass who affirm the new ecclesiology, the new theology, which comes from the objective mistake made in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which was not known even to Archbishop Lefebvre.
With the theology of Cushingism, the traditionalists Fr.John Hunwicke, the FSSP priests,  the Latin Mass societies,the Institute of Christ the King priests,the Remnant forum members and sedevacantists reject Church doctrine.They reject it dejure ( in principle) and defacto( in act and practise).
So the contemporary Traditional Latin Mass becomes modernist for them. The new ecclesiology is modernist.
Related imageSimilarly journalists Edward Pentin, Cindy Wooden, Marco Tosatti and Andrea Tornielli use Cushingism as a theology to interpret magisterial documents and fundamental doctrines of the Church. The result is non traditional, heretical and irrational.They attend Mass with this new theology.
The rational alternative is Feeneyism, which is traditional and dogmatic, but the traditionalists  are not allowed to offer Mass, with this exclusivist theology. The Left will not allow it.Heresy is a pre requisite for offering the TLM.
They now offer the Sacrifice of Jesus with ancient rituals and traditional vestments  but with an innovative theology and understanding of salvation and the Church.
I affirm Feeneyism as a theology ( there are no known exceptions to the dogma EENS) so I am not denying the dogma , as it was known by the saints and popes, over the centuries, when they offered the TLM.
-Lionel Andrades

No denial from traditionalists and Catholic journalists : contemporary TLM and Novus Ordo Mass is modernist, accompanied with a heretical theology (for them)

Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate have to continue to suffer because of the liturgy becoming ideological

Liturgy has been made subservient to political necessity.This heretical theology and doctrine ,this development, is necessary today to offer Holy Mass
If you speak to Cardinal Robert Sarah he will say that he rejects Feeneyism. So he interprets Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism.

When they interpret Vatican Council II according to Cushingism and not Fr. Leonard Feeney it has its influence on the liturgy

If any pope or religious, uses an irrational premise and inference to interpret magisterial documents, including Vatican Council II, the conclusion has to be irrational, non traditional- and heretical.


No comments: