Pray Intention on Sunday June 5, 2016 Mass Leaflet, La Domenica, San Paolo, in Italian in Rome.
1. Perché in un mondo disorientato da radicali cambiamenti e sconvolto da tanti conflitti, la Chiesa sia faro di salvezza per tutti i popoli, preghiamo:
1. Because in a world disoriented by radical changes and disturbed by so many conflicts, the Church will be a beacon of salvation for all peoples, let us pray.
The Society of St.Paul, Italy which publishes the weekly La Domenica, often mentions Christ being necessary for salvation, but excludes the necessity of the Catholic Church.1 The Society of St.Paul in the Prayer Intentions, of La Domenica is not allowed to say that the Catholic Church is needed for salvation. They never say all need to be visible members of the Catholic Church, all need 'faith and baptism'(AG 7,CCC 846,1257) for salvation.2
Today (June 5 Sunday ) there is a vague reference to salvation.In some way the Church will be a beacon of salvation for all peoples.What do they mean by this ? And they ask us to pray for this vague intention.
They present Christ without the necessity of the Church.Since they interpret Vatican Council II with the theology of Cushingism instead of Feeneyism.
For the Society of St.Paul, St. Ambrose and other saints, could have personally known of people in Heaven who are there without the baptism of water.So these cases for the religious of this congregation, are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) .So EENS is not reflected in their weekly La Domenica prayer intentions.
The Society of St. Paul and the Daughters of St.Paul are liberals.Though like the traditionalist, FSSP/SSPX priests they deny invisible for us baptism of desire.They reject EENS since for them the baptism of desire is explicit. This contradicts EENS.
Their General Curia reject Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and assume hypothetical cases are objective. Then Vatican Council II for this religious community , founded by Blessed James Alberione and Venerable Mother Thecla Merlo. becomes a break with EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.
The philosophical error of hypothetical cases being objective was made by the liberals at Boston and Rome in 1949 and then the error was inserted in Vatican Council II and this was accepted by the founders of this community.
Like the the traditionalist SSPX,at their theological and philosophical formation at seminaries and convents, they use a false premise and conclusion which is the basis of the new irrational theology. So they have rejected the philophical reasoning and traditional theology of the pre- Council of Trent times.
PREMISES IN PLACE FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST.PAUL
Last month Archbishop Forte quoted Pope Francis saying 'do it in a way that the premises are there, then I will draw out the conclusions.”
The premises are there in Vatican Council and the popes and pro-Mason religious communities draw a conclusion which is a break with Tradition and so they welcome this innovatve interpretation of Vatican Council II.
I interpret Vatican Council II without the premise and so the conclusion is not a break with Tradition.The magisterium like the communties of Blessed James Alberione and Venerable Mother Thecla Merlo will not discuss this issue. Religious who disagree with the General Curia could be dismissed.
The CDF and the Society of St. Paul want to interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise to reach an irrational conclusion.They reject a rational interpretation of Vatican Council II. It is as if it does not exist for them. They use an irrational reasoning as the basis of their new theology.Since the average Catholic does not know about this deception with theology, they have to quietly listen to vague, irrational and heretical prayer intentions during Holy Mass in Italian.-Lionel Andrades
The Society of St. Paul mocks the Catholic Church and the Catholic Faith