Dean of Theology at St. Anselm contradicts liberal Fr. John Zuhlsdorf

A simple petition could be filed at the bishop's office in Italy where Fr. Z is incardinated,pointing out that the good priest incardinated in Norcia,is generally telling a falsehood, when he writes about Catholic doctrine and theology.

The popular blogger-priest, whom I read daily and otherwise appreciate, uses a false premise and conclusion to interpret magisterial documents. As a Catholic I avoid this.

He assumes hypothetical cases are not hypothetical and he expects others to also make this error in principle.I do not and he does not correct me as a priest.

He suggests theoretical cases of the baptism of desire, allegedly without the baptism of water and being saved in invincible ignorance in 2016 are not theoretical.I do not.His teaching is irrational.

Since they are visible for him the baptism of desire is an exception to traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS Feeneyite).Not for me.

He actually interprets the Nicene Creed with this error( knowingly or unknowingly).This  is a first class heresy.How can such aa priest be incardinated in Italy ?

I have e-mailed these blog posts to him and he has no denial.

How can he say that he affirms EENS( Feeneyite).Since in Norcia and the rest of Italy  there are no explicit for us baptism of desire and blood or being saved in invincible ignorance cases  in 2016.There are none with or without the baptism of water whom he could meet on the streets.

He could be using this falsehood to remain politically correct but then so could Nancy Pelosi,John Allen at the National Catholic( Fishwrap) Register and other Catholics whom he criticizes with reference to Canon Law. 

I affirm the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite), Vatican Council II( Feneeyite), the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite) and Letter of the Holy Office 1949( Feeneyite)-all without the false premise and conclusion.Fr. Z will not do the same.

Neither will do the bishops in Italy do this, including the one in Norcia.Even the Benedictines at Norcia maintain the lie.Fr. Cassian Folsom osb, the Rector of the Benedictine monastery in Norcia will also not affirm the Faith without the lie.

However there is an exception.The Benedictine Dean of Theology at the St.Anselm University in Rome contradicts Fr. John Zuhlsdorf and Fr. Cassian Folsom osb.

Fr.Visintin does not lie.

He says there are no known exceptions to EENS( Feeneyite) in the present times.This makes sense. He is an honest priest.

John Martignoni the Americal apologist agrees with him.

Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson and many Catholic priests agree with Fr. Visintin.-Lionel Andrades

August 26, 2016
Canon Law could apply to Fr.John Zuhlsdorf in Norcia : promotes a falsehood
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/canon-law-should-apply-to-frjohn.html