Saturday, March 4, 2017

English universities present a lie on Catholic theology and doctrine - unethical for academics

The Universities of Nottingham and Bristol  and Kings College London present a lie on Catholic theology and doctrine. For academics this is un-ethical.It is a falsehood even though the pro-Left  Catholic bishops and cardinals in  Britain support the lie.
This is official deception.
In the University of Nottingham video series Theologians in Conversation they use unethical and irrational Cushingism as a theology to interpret Vatican Council II.So the Council emerges as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite).
This is un-ethical for Tom Loughlin, Professor of Historical Theology. 
They will not interpret Vatican Council II with the theology of Feeneyism which is rational, traditional and does not use a false premise.They are aware that if they did so then Vatican Council would be in harmony with the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church, mentioned in Redemptoris Missio.
For instance Gaudium e Specs 22 is mentioned as an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in one of the videos.Tom Loughlin does not object. Instead he assumes that this is a reference to someone personally known in the present times, or over the last 50 years, who is saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.Only if someone existed as such there could be an exception. This is the theology of Cushingism.There is no such person. However with this irrational inference made on the video Vatican Council II emerges as a break with the old ecclesiology of the Church and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.1This is something normal for the University of Nottingham theologians since the same message is there in a few videos in the series.
The same error is made by the University of Bristol on a video available on their website.Gavin D'Costa uses the theology of Cushingism to suggest that there are known cases of non Catholics saved with 'that ray of the Truth'(NA 2), which enlightens all people.So there is salvation outside the Church for him and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus has been discarded.It is no more absolutist for them.They interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus also with some variation of Cushingism.
Even after being informed Gavin D'Costa repeats the Jewish Left narrative for the Catholic Church.He does not say that Nostra Aetate 4 says Catholics are the new people of God, Catholics are the new Chosen People, they are a continuation of the Jewish religion.Neither does he state that Ad Gentes 7 indicates all Jews and other non Catholics, Muslims included, are on the way to Hell unless they enter the Church as members.In this way he keeps his job at the university.
The professors do not want to be considered Anti-Semitic by the ADL and the Jewish Left. So like the Catholic bishops and priests they are protecting their office and changing Catholic theology and doctrine.
This is deception.It is un-ethical for academics in Britain.-Lionel Andrades

He could have said that hypothetical cases mentioned in Vatican Council II (LG 16, LG 14, LG 8, NA 2 etc) and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr.Leonard Feeney ( baptism of desire(BOD) and invincible ignorance (I.I)) are not exceptions to EENS.This is something obvious.It is common sense. We do not know any one on earth or Heaven saved as such even if claims are made to the contrary.
But he has to lie for whatever reason known to him.
Gaudium et Specs which he refers to is a hypothetical case.
Lumen Gentium 16 (invincible ignorance) also refers to a hypothetical case.
They never were an exception to the dogma EENS.These passages are not relevant to EENS.
Zero cases of something are not exceptions to the dogma EENS says the apologist John Martignoni.
BOD and I.I are not exceptions to EENS says Fr.Stefano Visintin osb, Vice Rector at the Pontifical University of St.Anselm, Rome and former Dean of Theology.
Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson has the same message.


 MAY 25, 2015
Photograph of Dr Susannah TicciatiProfessor Paul Joyce

OCTOBER 9, 2014

Faculty at the Department of Theology and Religious Studies Kings College, London use an irrational premise which is a falsehood.

OCTOBER 7, 2014

Universities in England have a new interpretation of Catholic doctrine : uncontested

When the University of Bristol permits Prof. Gavin D'Costa and the faculty to use an irrational premise, it is a secular lie 

Gavin D'Costa comes across as professionally unethical.His irrationality would not be accepted by academics in England 

Gavin D'Costa presents an irrational view of the Catholic Faith to the Islamic Society of the University of Bristol and visiting Muslim professors 

Muslim professors must know exactly what are the teachings of the Catholic Church about Islam and other religions, before and after Vatican Council II  

APRIL 9, 2015

University of Bristol and Gavin D'Costa repeat the lie on Catholic teaching : interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism

October 7, 2014

Department of Theology and Religious Studies at the University of Bristol is still teaching an irrationality : even after being informed

May 31, 2014

Joseph Shaw, Gavin D'Costa obedient to Cardinal Vince Nicols are misleading lay Catholics

May 29, 2014

Cardinal Nicols and FIUV are telling a falsehood. Why do rank and file Catholics have to accept it?

May 20, 2014

If someone is saved with ' a ray of the Truth' (Nostra Aetate 2) it is not known in 2014, so NA 2 does not contradict AG 7 or extra ecclesiam nulla salus

APRIL 25, 2015

Gavin D'Costa will not say that Vatican Council II indicates all Muslims in Britain and elsewhere are on the way to Hell : there is no correction or apology for irrational reasoning 

Gavin D'Costa has not denied that he uses a false reasoning, which is factually and objectively incorrect 

MAY 10, 2014

Prof.Gavin D'Costa cannot say that all the Muslims in England are on the way to Hell according to Vatican Council II (AG 7)

MAY 8, 2014

Lady Hale is promoting the political left version of Vatican Council II at the University of Bristol, England

May 5, 2014

University of Bristol is making the same factual error on Nostra Aetate as Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits in Boston

Two weeks and no clarification from the University of Bristol administration :objective error and factually incorrect information about the Catholic Church

No comments: