Pope Francis: doctrine unites, ideology divides
Pope Francis delivers the homily at the daily
Mass at the Casa Santa Marta.
(Vatican Radio) True doctrine unites; ideology divides.That was the message of Pope Francis in the homily
at the morning Mass at the Casa Santa Marta on Friday.
Lionel: Pope Francis teaches false doctrine. He
also uses a false theology.This is ideology.
This is a new ideology in the Church,it is a
sin, a mortal sin. Satan supports it.He
contradicts the popes and the magisterium of
the past and calls it 'a development'.It is a new
revelation in the Church, a false revelation
which opposes the de fide teachings of the
Church inspired by the Holy Spirit.
also uses a false theology.This is ideology.
This is a new ideology in the Church,it is a
sin, a mortal sin. Satan supports it.He
contradicts the popes and the magisterium of
the past and calls it 'a development'.It is a new
revelation in the Church, a false revelation
which opposes the de fide teachings of the
Church inspired by the Holy Spirit.
____________________________
The Pope based his reflections on the so-called Council of
Jerusalem which, around the year 49 A.D., decided that
gentile converts to Christianity would not have to be
circumcised.The Holy Father was commenting on the First
Reading, from the Acts of the Apostles. He noted that
even in the first Christian community “there were
jealousies, power struggles, a certain deviousness
that wanted to profit from and to buy power.” There
are always problems, he said: “We are human,
we are sinners” and there are difficulties, even in
the Church. But being sinners leads to humility and
to drawing close to the Lord, as Saviour who saves
us from our sins. With regard to the gentiles
who the Spirit called to become Christians, the
Holy Father recalled that, in the reading, the apostles
and the elders chose several people to go to
Antioch together with Paul and Barnabas. The reading
describes two different kinds of people: those who
had “forceful discussions” but with “a good spirit,”
on the one hand; and those who “sowed confusion”:
Jerusalem which, around the year 49 A.D., decided that
gentile converts to Christianity would not have to be
circumcised.The Holy Father was commenting on the First
Reading, from the Acts of the Apostles. He noted that
even in the first Christian community “there were
jealousies, power struggles, a certain deviousness
that wanted to profit from and to buy power.” There
are always problems, he said: “We are human,
we are sinners” and there are difficulties, even in
the Church. But being sinners leads to humility and
to drawing close to the Lord, as Saviour who saves
us from our sins. With regard to the gentiles
who the Spirit called to become Christians, the
Holy Father recalled that, in the reading, the apostles
and the elders chose several people to go to
Antioch together with Paul and Barnabas. The reading
describes two different kinds of people: those who
had “forceful discussions” but with “a good spirit,”
on the one hand; and those who “sowed confusion”:
“The group of the apostles who want to discuss
the problem, and the others who go and create
problems. They divide, they divide the Church,
they say that what the Apostles preached is not
what Jesus said, that it is not the truth.”
the problem, and the others who go and create
problems. They divide, they divide the Church,
they say that what the Apostles preached is not
what Jesus said, that it is not the truth.”
Lionel: The two popes now
infer that what the Apostles,
Church Fathers and Medieval
Church Fathers taught, is
not what Jesus taught.Instead they
say that their new 'developed
doctines' and theology is what
Jesus meant to have taught.The
two popes are praised by the
Masons and the Jewish Left who
affirm pro-Satanic sodomy, abortion,
pornography, persecution of the
Catholic Church...
infer that what the Apostles,
Church Fathers and Medieval
Church Fathers taught, is
not what Jesus taught.Instead they
say that their new 'developed
doctines' and theology is what
Jesus meant to have taught.The
two popes are praised by the
Masons and the Jewish Left who
affirm pro-Satanic sodomy, abortion,
pornography, persecution of the
Catholic Church...
The Apostles discussed the situation among
themselves, and in the end came to an agreement:
themselves, and in the end came to an agreement:
“But it is not a political agreement; it is the
inspiration of the Holy Spirit that leads
them to say: no things, no necessities. Only
those who say: don’t eat meat at the time,
meat sacrificed to idols, because that was
communion with the idols; abstain from
blood, from animals that were strangled,
and from illegitimate unions.”
inspiration of the Holy Spirit that leads
them to say: no things, no necessities. Only
those who say: don’t eat meat at the time,
meat sacrificed to idols, because that was
communion with the idols; abstain from
blood, from animals that were strangled,
and from illegitimate unions.”
The Pope pointed to the “liberty of the Spirit” that
leads to agreement: so, he said, the gentiles
were allowed to enter the Church without having
to undergo circumcision. It was at the heart of the
“first Council” of the Church: the Holy Spirit and
they, the Pope with the Bishops, all together,”
gathered together in order “to clarify the doctrine;”
and later, through the centuries – as at Ephesus
or at Vatican II – because “it is a duty of the Church
to clarify the doctrine,” so that “what Jesus said
in the Gospels, what is the Spirit of the Gospels,
would be understood well”:
leads to agreement: so, he said, the gentiles
were allowed to enter the Church without having
to undergo circumcision. It was at the heart of the
“first Council” of the Church: the Holy Spirit and
they, the Pope with the Bishops, all together,”
gathered together in order “to clarify the doctrine;”
and later, through the centuries – as at Ephesus
or at Vatican II – because “it is a duty of the Church
to clarify the doctrine,” so that “what Jesus said
in the Gospels, what is the Spirit of the Gospels,
would be understood well”:
Lionel: At Ephesus they clarfied
doctrine at Vatican Council II they
changed it.At Vatican Council II
they used a false premise to
create a new and non traditional
conclusion. With this irrational
philosophy a new theology
was created.With this innovation
they interpret all magisterial
documents, past and present.
doctrine at Vatican Council II they
changed it.At Vatican Council II
they used a false premise to
create a new and non traditional
conclusion. With this irrational
philosophy a new theology
was created.With this innovation
they interpret all magisterial
documents, past and present.
With this false theology Pope Benedict
XVI announced that Vatican Council
II was 'a development' and it
contradicted the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus as it was
known in the 16th century and
of course,to the Church Fathers
and the Apostles.
XVI announced that Vatican Council
II was 'a development' and it
contradicted the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus as it was
known in the 16th century and
of course,to the Church Fathers
and the Apostles.
Pope Benedict also meant that when
he interprets the dogma outside the
church there is no salvation, he assumes
that the baptism of desire and blood
and being saved in invincible ignorance
refers to visible in the flesh cases(Christianity
and the World Religions, ITC,Vatican).This is
Cushingism as opposed to traditional
Feeneyism.So he supports the error
of the magisterium in the Letter
of the Holy Offfice 1949.Cardinal
Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani
mistook invisible baptism of
desire as being visible.Then he
inferred that hypothetical cases
were explicit exceptins to Feeneyite
extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Cardinal Cushing and the Jesuits
accepted this error and made it
the theology of Vatican Council II.
he interprets the dogma outside the
church there is no salvation, he assumes
that the baptism of desire and blood
and being saved in invincible ignorance
refers to visible in the flesh cases(Christianity
and the World Religions, ITC,Vatican).This is
Cushingism as opposed to traditional
Feeneyism.So he supports the error
of the magisterium in the Letter
of the Holy Offfice 1949.Cardinal
Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani
mistook invisible baptism of
desire as being visible.Then he
inferred that hypothetical cases
were explicit exceptins to Feeneyite
extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Cardinal Cushing and the Jesuits
accepted this error and made it
the theology of Vatican Council II.
Similarly Pope Benedict means that
LG 16, LG 8, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc
refer to visible cases in 2016 saved
without the baptism of water.
So Vatican Council II becomes a
rupture with the dogma outside
the Church no salvation and the
Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius
IX.He will not affirm Feeneyite
extra ecclesiam nulla salus and
neither will he affirm Feeenyite
Vatican Council II. Since this
would be opposing the leftist
ideology for the Catholic Church.
This is the ideology approved
by the liberal rabbis representing
Israel.This is the ideology Pope
Francis sells.. He permits the liturgy
of the Tridentine Rite Mass only
with this ideology.The SSPX and
the Franciscans of the Immaculate
will be welcomed into the Church
only when they accept this
Cushingite ideology in the
interpretation of magisterial documents.
LG 16, LG 8, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc
refer to visible cases in 2016 saved
without the baptism of water.
So Vatican Council II becomes a
rupture with the dogma outside
the Church no salvation and the
Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius
IX.He will not affirm Feeneyite
extra ecclesiam nulla salus and
neither will he affirm Feeenyite
Vatican Council II. Since this
would be opposing the leftist
ideology for the Catholic Church.
This is the ideology approved
by the liberal rabbis representing
Israel.This is the ideology Pope
Francis sells.. He permits the liturgy
of the Tridentine Rite Mass only
with this ideology.The SSPX and
the Franciscans of the Immaculate
will be welcomed into the Church
only when they accept this
Cushingite ideology in the
interpretation of magisterial documents.
________________________________________________
“But there were always people who without any commission go out to disturb the Christian community with speeches that upset souls: ‘Eh, no, someone who says that is a heretic, you can’t say this, or that; this is the doctrine of the Church.’
Lionel: Jesus is the same
yesterday, today and tomorrow,
objective reality does not change
in the Church, the Holy Spirit
cannot contradict Himself.
However the pope is a
heretic when he says conscience
is supreme and there is no
objective reality.
yesterday, today and tomorrow,
objective reality does not change
in the Church, the Holy Spirit
cannot contradict Himself.
However the pope is a
heretic when he says conscience
is supreme and there is no
objective reality.
Objective reality says all non
Catholics are on the way to
Hell, he and the Jesuits, say not
all, but only 'those who know.'
Then they infer that 'they
know who knows' and suggest
that most people in ignorance
will be saved.So there is no need
for traditional Mission for them.
Catholics are on the way to
Hell, he and the Jesuits, say not
all, but only 'those who know.'
Then they infer that 'they
know who knows' and suggest
that most people in ignorance
will be saved.So there is no need
for traditional Mission for them.
Pope Francis is a first class heretic
when he changes the Nicene Creed
in which we pray 'I believe in
one baptism for the forgiveness of
sins'.It refers to one known baptism,
for me, and not three or more.
when he changes the Nicene Creed
in which we pray 'I believe in
one baptism for the forgiveness of
sins'.It refers to one known baptism,
for me, and not three or more.
He is a heretic when he rejects
the dogma extra ecclesiam
nulla salus, in harmony with the
Apostles and Church
Fathers and calls it 'triumphalism'.
He approves a new Cushingite
version of the dogma on
salvation. which is a new doctine
in the Church. It is political
ideology.
the dogma extra ecclesiam
nulla salus, in harmony with the
Apostles and Church
Fathers and calls it 'triumphalism'.
He approves a new Cushingite
version of the dogma on
salvation. which is a new doctine
in the Church. It is political
ideology.
He is a heretic in morals too
when he permits the Eucharist to
be given to numerous people in
manifest mortal sin the latest
being in the cathedral in Toronto.
when he permits the Eucharist to
be given to numerous people in
manifest mortal sin the latest
being in the cathedral in Toronto.
He is my pope but he is also in
heresy as is Pope Benedict.The
heresy on the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus is widepread
and is shared by Catholic
traditionalists and conservatives
too who use Cushingism
as a theology.
heresy as is Pope Benedict.The
heresy on the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus is widepread
and is shared by Catholic
traditionalists and conservatives
too who use Cushingism
as a theology.
___________________________
And they are fanatics of things that are not
clear, like those fanatics who go there sowing
weeds in order to divide the Christian community.
And this is the problem: when the doctrine of the
Church, that which comes from the Gospel,
that which the Holy Spirit inspires – because
Jesus said, “He will teach us and remind
you of all that I have taught’ – [when] that
doctrine becomes an ideology. And this
is the great error of those people.”
clear, like those fanatics who go there sowing
weeds in order to divide the Christian community.
And this is the problem: when the doctrine of the
Church, that which comes from the Gospel,
that which the Holy Spirit inspires – because
Jesus said, “He will teach us and remind
you of all that I have taught’ – [when] that
doctrine becomes an ideology. And this
is the great error of those people.”
Lionel: There are also liberal fanatics,
who have brought in an innovation
in the Church with their Cushingite
theology.
They are the new fascists.
Those priests who oppose it in Rome
for example( now under control of
the liberal rabbis) will lose
their incardination. Ecclesiastic Masonry
will suspend a priest who interprets
Vatican Counci II with Feeneyism.
They enforce their new ideology
based on the New Theology.
All religious communities have to
claim invisible people are visible
on earth to remain in good
standing with the 'new church'.
who have brought in an innovation
in the Church with their Cushingite
theology.
They are the new fascists.
Those priests who oppose it in Rome
for example( now under control of
the liberal rabbis) will lose
their incardination. Ecclesiastic Masonry
will suspend a priest who interprets
Vatican Counci II with Feeneyism.
They enforce their new ideology
based on the New Theology.
All religious communities have to
claim invisible people are visible
on earth to remain in good
standing with the 'new church'.
The cardinals and bishops appear
corrupt like the magisterium.
Otherwise they would oppose
Cushingism and the false
church within the Catholic
Church.
corrupt like the magisterium.
Otherwise they would oppose
Cushingism and the false
church within the Catholic
Church.
______________________
These individuals, the Pope explained, “were not
believers, they were ideologized,” they had an ideology
that closed the heart to the work of the Holy Spirit.
believers, they were ideologized,” they had an ideology
that closed the heart to the work of the Holy Spirit.
Lionel: Oh no we are believers, we are
not saying anything new. I for one,
affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla
salus according to the missionaries
in the 16th century and not the two
liberal , pro- Mason popes.I reject
their ideology.
not saying anything new. I for one,
affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla
salus according to the missionaries
in the 16th century and not the two
liberal , pro- Mason popes.I reject
their ideology.
Pope John Paul II is still my favourite
pope and the last of the grand popes.
pope and the last of the grand popes.
I affirm Vatican Council II with Feeneyism
(LG 16 refers to an invisible case in
2017) and so the Council is not a rupture
with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope
Pius IX and the past ecclesiology of
the 16th magisterium. I would appeal
to all the cardinals to interpret Vatican
Council II like me an oppose the
ideology of the Mssons and the two
popes in line with them.
(LG 16 refers to an invisible case in
2017) and so the Council is not a rupture
with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope
Pius IX and the past ecclesiology of
the 16th magisterium. I would appeal
to all the cardinals to interpret Vatican
Council II like me an oppose the
ideology of the Mssons and the two
popes in line with them.
I affirm Vatican Council II and the
Catechism of the Catholic Church
but affirm it with Feeneyite reasoning
( invisible people in reality cannot
be exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or Ad Gentes
7 which says all need faith and
baptism for salvation.
________________________________________
The Apostles, on the other hand, certainly discussed
things forcefully, but they were not ideologized: “They
had hearts open to what the Holy Spirit said. And
after the discussion ‘it seemed good to the Holy
Spirit and to us.’”
things forcefully, but they were not ideologized: “They
had hearts open to what the Holy Spirit said. And
after the discussion ‘it seemed good to the Holy
Spirit and to us.’”
Lionel: The Holy Spirit has not given
us a new revelation. However with
irrational Cushingism Vatican
Council II has a non traditional conclusion.
This conclusion created with a false
premise, is projected by the two popes,
as the work of the Holy Spirit and
a new revelation in the Church.
They simply call it ' a development'.
This is a new spirit in the Church
and it is un-holy.
us a new revelation. However with
irrational Cushingism Vatican
Council II has a non traditional conclusion.
This conclusion created with a false
premise, is projected by the two popes,
as the work of the Holy Spirit and
a new revelation in the Church.
They simply call it ' a development'.
This is a new spirit in the Church
and it is un-holy.
___________________________________________
Pope Francis’ final exhortation was to not be
afraid in the face “of the opinions of the
ideologues of doctrine.”
afraid in the face “of the opinions of the
ideologues of doctrine.”
Lionel: We will be there to let you know
that we still exist.We will oppose,
until death, your leftist ideology in
the Catholic Church.We will have to
welcome the time when a Holy
Father along with the secular, pro-Satan,
authorities sends us to prison and death.
We must oppose the ideologues of new
doctrine.
that we still exist.We will oppose,
until death, your leftist ideology in
the Catholic Church.We will have to
welcome the time when a Holy
Father along with the secular, pro-Satan,
authorities sends us to prison and death.
We must oppose the ideologues of new
doctrine.
______________________________________________
The Church, he concluded, has “its proper Magisterium, the Magisterium of the Pope, of the Bishops, of the Councils,”
Lionel: The present magisterium opposes
the magisterium of the 16th century
Catholic Church.This is official according
to Pope Benedict XVI's interview in the
Avvenire in March 2016.This was a
public statement.So one of the two
magisterium's has to be wrong.
One has to be in heresy. One has
to be false.I will affirm the 16th
century magisterium on this issue.
the magisterium of the 16th century
Catholic Church.This is official according
to Pope Benedict XVI's interview in the
Avvenire in March 2016.This was a
public statement.So one of the two
magisterium's has to be wrong.
One has to be in heresy. One has
to be false.I will affirm the 16th
century magisterium on this issue.
_______________________________________________
and we must go along the path “that comes from
the preaching of Jesus, and from the teaching
and assistance of the Holy Spirit,” which is “always
open, always free,” because “doctrine unites,
the Councils unite the Christian community,
while, on the other hand, “ideology divides.”
the preaching of Jesus, and from the teaching
and assistance of the Holy Spirit,” which is “always
open, always free,” because “doctrine unites,
the Councils unite the Christian community,
while, on the other hand, “ideology divides.”
Lionel: This is political speciousness.
Cushingism divides. Cushingism
creates a new doctrine.New
doctrines on salvation and morals
is ideology. It is the ideology of the
two popes and many cardinals and
bishops.It is a rupture with the
Church Fathers and Jesus ' teachings
to the Apostles.It is not Catholic.-Lionel Andrades
Cushingism divides. Cushingism
creates a new doctrine.New
doctrines on salvation and morals
is ideology. It is the ideology of the
two popes and many cardinals and
bishops.It is a rupture with the
Church Fathers and Jesus ' teachings
to the Apostles.It is not Catholic.-Lionel Andrades
http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2017/05/19/pope_francis_doctrine_unites,_ideology_divides/1313444
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment