Monday, May 22, 2017

This is Pope Francis' political speciousness.Cushingism divides. Cushingism creates a new doctrine.New doctrines on salvation and morals is ideology.

Pope Francis \ Homilies

Pope Francis: doctrine unites, ideology divides

Image result for Photo of Pope Francis doctrine and ideology divide

Pope Francis delivers the homily at the daily 

Mass at the Casa Santa Marta.

(Vatican Radio) True doctrine unites; ideology divides. 
That was the message of Pope Francis in the homily
 at the morning Mass at the Casa Santa Marta on Friday.

Lionel: Pope Francis teaches false doctrine. He 
also uses a false theology.This is ideology. 
This is a new ideology in the Church,it is a 
sin, a mortal sin. Satan supports it.He 
contradicts the popes and the magisterium of
 the past and calls it 'a development'.It is a new
 revelation in the Church, a false revelation 
which opposes the de fide teachings of the
 Church inspired by the Holy Spirit.
The Pope based his reflections on the so-called Council of 
Jerusalem which, around the year 49 A.D., decided that 
gentile converts to Christianity would not have to be 
circumcised.The Holy Father was commenting on the First
 Reading, from the Acts of the Apostles. He noted that 
even in the first Christian community “there were 
jealousies, power struggles, a certain deviousness
 that wanted to profit from and to buy power.” There
 are always problems, he said: “We are human, 
we are sinners” and there are difficulties, even in 
the Church. But being sinners leads to humility and 
to drawing close to the Lord, as Saviour who saves
 us from our sins. With regard to the gentiles
 who the Spirit called to become Christians, the
 Holy Father recalled that, in the reading, the apostles
 and the elders chose several people to go to 
Antioch together with Paul and Barnabas. The reading
 describes two different kinds of people: those who 
had “forceful discussions” but with “a good spirit,”
 on the one hand; and those who “sowed confusion”:
“The group of the apostles who want to discuss
 the problem, and the others who go and create 
problems. They divide, they divide the Church, 
they say that what the Apostles preached is not 
what Jesus said, that it is not the truth.”
Lionel: The two popes now 
infer that what the Apostles,
 Church Fathers and Medieval 
Church Fathers taught, is
 not what Jesus taught.Instead they 
say that their new 'developed 
doctines' and theology is what 
Jesus meant to have taught.The 
two  popes are praised by the 
Masons and  the Jewish Left who
 affirm pro-Satanic sodomy, abortion,
 pornography, persecution of the 
Catholic Church...
The Apostles discussed the situation among 
themselves, and in the end came to an agreement:
“But it is not a political agreement; it is the 
inspiration of the Holy Spirit that leads
 them to say: no things, no necessities. Only
 those who say: don’t eat meat at the time, 
meat sacrificed to idols, because that was 
communion with the idols; abstain from
 blood, from animals that were strangled,
 and from illegitimate unions.”
The Pope pointed to the “liberty of the Spirit” that
 leads to agreement: so, he said, the gentiles 
were allowed to enter the Church without having 
to undergo circumcision. It was at the heart of the 
“first Council” of the Church: the Holy Spirit and 
they, the Pope with the Bishops, all together,” 
gathered together in order “to clarify the doctrine;”
 and later, through the centuries – as at Ephesus 
or at Vatican II – because “it is a duty of the Church
 to clarify the doctrine,” so that “what Jesus said 
in the Gospels, what is the Spirit of the Gospels, 
would be understood well”:
Lionel: At Ephesus they clarfied 
doctrine at Vatican Council II they 
changed it.At Vatican Council II 
they used a false premise to
 create a new and non traditional
 conclusion. With this irrational 
philosophy a new theology
 was created.With this innovation
 they interpret all magisterial 
documents, past and present.
With this false theology Pope Benedict
 XVI announced that Vatican Council
 II was 'a development' and it
 contradicted the dogma extra 
ecclesiam nulla salus as it was 
known in the 16th century and
 of course,to  the Church Fathers
 and the Apostles.
Pope Benedict also meant that when 
he interprets the dogma outside the
 church there is no salvation, he assumes
 that the baptism of desire and blood 
and being saved in invincible ignorance 
refers to visible in the flesh cases(Christianity
 and the World Religions, ITC,Vatican).This is 
Cushingism as opposed to traditional
 Feeneyism.So he supports the error 
of the magisterium in the Letter
 of the Holy Offfice 1949.Cardinal
 Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani
 mistook invisible baptism of 
desire as being visible.Then he 
inferred that hypothetical cases 
were explicit exceptins to Feeneyite
 extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Cardinal Cushing and the Jesuits
 accepted this error and made it
 the theology of Vatican Council II.
Similarly Pope Benedict  means that 
LG 16, LG 8, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc 
refer to visible cases in 2016 saved 
without the baptism of water. 
So Vatican Council II becomes a 
rupture with the dogma outside
 the Church no salvation and the 
Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius
 IX.He will not affirm Feeneyite
extra ecclesiam nulla salus and
 neither will he affirm Feeenyite
 Vatican Council II. Since this 
would be opposing the leftist 
ideology for the Catholic Church.
This is the ideology approved
 by the liberal rabbis representing
 Israel.This is the ideology Pope 
Francis sells.. He permits the liturgy 
of the Tridentine Rite Mass only
 with this ideology.The SSPX and
 the Franciscans of the Immaculate
 will be welcomed into the Church 
only when they accept this 
Cushingite ideology in the 
interpretation of magisterial documents.
“But there were always people who without any commission go out to disturb the Christian community with speeches that upset souls: ‘Eh, no, someone who says that is a heretic, you can’t say this, or that; this is the doctrine of the Church.’
Lionel: Jesus is the same 
yesterday, today and tomorrow, 
objective reality does not change
 in the Church, the Holy Spirit
 cannot contradict Himself.
However the pope is a 
heretic when he says conscience
 is supreme and there is no 
objective reality.
Objective reality says all non 
Catholics are on the way to 
Hell, he and the Jesuits, say not
 all, but only 'those who know.' 
Then they infer that 'they 
know who knows' and suggest
 that most people in ignorance 
will be saved.So there is no need
 for traditional Mission for them.
Pope Francis  is a first class heretic
 when he changes the Nicene Creed
 in which we pray 'I believe in 
one baptism for the forgiveness of
 sins'.It refers to one known baptism,
 for me, and not three or more.
He is a heretic when he rejects
 the dogma extra ecclesiam 
nulla salus, in harmony with the
 Apostles and Church 
Fathers and calls it 'triumphalism'.
He approves a new Cushingite 
version of the dogma on 
salvation. which is a new doctine
 in the Church. It is political
He is a heretic in morals too 
when he permits the Eucharist to 
be given to numerous people in 
manifest mortal sin the latest 
being in the cathedral in Toronto. 
He is my pope but he is also in 
heresy as is Pope Benedict.The 
heresy on the dogma extra 
ecclesiam nulla salus is widepread
 and is shared by Catholic
 traditionalists and conservatives
 too who use Cushingism 
as a theology.
And they are fanatics of things that are not 
clear, like those fanatics who go there sowing 
weeds in order to divide the Christian community. 
And this is the problem: when the doctrine of the 
Church, that which comes from the Gospel, 
that which the Holy Spirit inspires – because 
Jesus said, “He will teach us and remind 
you of all that I have taught’ – [when] that
 doctrine becomes an ideology. And this 
is the great error of those people.”
Lionel: There are also liberal fanatics,
who have brought in an innovation 
in the Church with their Cushingite 
They are the new fascists. 
Those priests who oppose it in Rome
 for example( now under control of 
the liberal rabbis) will lose 
their incardination. Ecclesiastic Masonry
 will suspend a priest who interprets 
Vatican Counci II with Feeneyism.
They enforce their new ideology 
based on the New Theology.
All religious communities have to 
claim invisible people are visible 
on earth to remain in good 
standing with the  'new church'.
The cardinals and bishops appear
 corrupt like the magisterium. 
Otherwise they would oppose 
Cushingism and the false 
church within the Catholic 
These individuals, the Pope explained, “were not 
believers, they were ideologized,” they had an ideology
 that closed the heart to the work of the Holy Spirit. 
Lionel: Oh no we are believers, we are 
not saying anything new. I for one,
 affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla
 salus according to the missionaries 
in the 16th century and not the two
 liberal , pro- Mason popes.I reject 
their ideology.
Pope John Paul II is still my favourite
 pope and the last of the grand popes.
I affirm Vatican Council II with Feeneyism
(LG 16 refers to an invisible case in
 2017) and so the Council is not a rupture
 with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope
 Pius IX and the past ecclesiology of 
the 16th magisterium. I would appeal
 to all the cardinals to interpret Vatican
 Council II like me an oppose the 
ideology of the Mssons and the two
 popes in line with them.
I affirm Vatican Council II and the 
Catechism of the Catholic Church
 but affirm it with Feeneyite reasoning
( invisible people in reality cannot 
be exceptions to the dogma extra 
ecclesiam nulla salus or Ad Gentes 
7 which says all need faith and
 baptism for salvation.
The Apostles, on the other hand, certainly discussed
 things forcefully, but they were not ideologized: “They
 had hearts open to what the Holy Spirit said. And 
after the discussion ‘it seemed good to the Holy 
Spirit and to us.’”
Lionel: The Holy Spirit has not given
 us a new revelation. However with
 irrational Cushingism Vatican 
Council II has a non traditional conclusion.
 This conclusion created  with a false
 premise, is projected by the two popes,
 as the work of the Holy Spirit and 
a new revelation in the Church. 
They simply call it ' a development'.
This is a new spirit in the Church 
and it is un-holy.
Pope Francis’ final exhortation was to not be 
afraid in the face “of the opinions of the
 ideologues of doctrine.”
Lionel: We will be there to let you know 
that we still exist.We will oppose, 
until death, your leftist ideology i
the Catholic Church.We will have to 
welcome the time when a Holy 
Father along with the secular, pro-Satan,
 authorities sends us to prison and death.
We must oppose the ideologues of new
 The Church, he concluded, has “its proper Magisterium, the Magisterium of the Pope, of the Bishops, of the Councils,”
Lionel: The present magisterium opposes
 the magisterium of the 16th century 
Catholic Church.This is official according
 to Pope Benedict XVI's interview in the 
Avvenire in March 2016.This was a
 public statement.So one of the two
 magisterium's has to be wrong.
One has to be in heresy. One has 
to be false.I will affirm the 16th 
century magisterium on this issue.
 and we must go along the path “that comes from 
the preaching of Jesus, and from the teaching 
and assistance of the Holy Spirit,” which is “always
 open, always free,” because “doctrine unites, 
the Councils unite the Christian community, 
while, on the other hand, “ideology divides.”
Lionel: This is political speciousness.
Cushingism divides. Cushingism
 creates a new doctrine.New 
doctrines on salvation and morals  
is ideology. It is the ideology of the
 two popes and many cardinals and
 bishops.It is a rupture with the 
Church Fathers and Jesus ' teachings
 to the Apostles.It is not Catholic.-Lionel Andrades,_ideology_divides/1313444

No comments: