Tuesday, July 11, 2017

Monks of St.Benedict at Subiaco do not have the freedom to proclaim the Catholic Faith. The State allows them to work and pray but not proclaim


The monks of St.Benedict at Subiaco do not have the freedom to proclaim the Catholic Faith. The State allows them to work and pray but not proclaim.In Italy the government today is pro-Mason and so pro-Satan.They will place restrictions on the things of God, especially the Catholic Church, which is the only Church of God and the only path to salvation, the only means to avoid Hell.
So unlike St. Benedict, whose feast day it is today,they cannot proclaim that outside the Church there is no salvation and that all Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, Muslims, atheiests and communists are on the path to Hell unless they become members of the Catholic Church .
The secular state, which promotes things of Satan, will not allow them to make this proclamation in harmony with Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Dominus Iesus,Nicene Creed,Athanasius Creed and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, all interpreted with the theology of Feeneyism.
So to protect their historical property the Catholic Church in Rome is not proclaiming the Faith. Also the monks to stay with the community are not proclaiming the Faith as did St. Benedict and St. Scholastica whose bodies are now at the monastery in Cassino.
Like at Cassino and Subiaco, at the Benedictine university of St. Anselm in Rome, the theology is controlled by the State, it is controlled by Satan.
The only way the monks at Santa Scholastica, Subiaco can proclaim the Faith it seems is by leaving the monastery and going on foot, in the country side, like St. Benedict.
He is the paton saint of Europe and he evangelised on foot.
But how are the monks to leave their cars,modern appliances and all-things-found-life style ? Eighty percent of them at the monastery are elderly.They have lay people from the town at Subiaco employed at the monastery.
I have been there a few times and had lunch together with the Abbot and monks at Subiaco before last Easter.I have attended Mass there when the people of the town are also present.
If the Mass in Latin or Italian is offered at this monastery it would make no difference since the proclamation of the faith, the theology of the Mass and the ecclesiology is being controlled.It is not the same as during Mass, when St. Benedict lived in his cave.
The monks are forced to choose from two interpretations of Vatican Council II. Vatican Council II (Cushingite) and Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).The State forces them to accept only Vatican Council II (Cushingite). Vatican Council II(Cushingite) cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit. Since it has false philosophical reasoning.There are objective errors and it violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.
The Benedictine monks have to assume that there were visible cases of the baptism of desire etc which were objective exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
This was the objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case. The magisterium assumed invisible people were visible exceptions to all needing to be members of the Church for salvation.
This was the philosophical reasoning at Vatican Council II. The passages which mention the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance (AG 7, LG 14) in Vatican Council II are superfluous. They should not have been there in the Council text.
They are there since th
e Council Fathers, like Cardinal Richard Cushing placed them there.He used a false premise (invisible baptism of desire is visible). His new theology was false ( invisible cases are visible exceptions to the traditional interpretation on exclusive salvation in the Church), this is expressed in LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc. He violated the Principle of Non Contradiction ( how can people in Heaven be visible exceptions on earth? ). His conclusion was false. Since how can INVISIBLE for US LG 16 etc be considered visible and excluding the baptism of water ? So Vatican Council II becomes a break with Tradition, in particular the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite) and the Syllabus of Errors.All this has to be accepted by the Benedictines.
Obviously Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is different.It is without the false premise and conclusion of the State controlled theology. It would be a different Vatican Council II.It would be traditional and not a rupture with Tradition. It would affirm the teachings of the Church, over the centuries, guided by the Holy Spirit.It would be in harmony with the spirituality and theology of St. Benedict.
But it is banned today.
The monks fear for their life in their old age and the young Benedictines do not seem to know about Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) since it is not being taught at the pontifical universities.Even if they know about it....?!
So the 'liberal' monks promote the New Theology which is not the work of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake.If some of the Benedictine priests offer the Traditional Latin Mass it is with the New Ecclesiology, which cannot be from the Holy Spirit.
They affirm Vatican Council II (Cushingism) and so approve of inter faith marriages.For them it is not adultery. 1
They do not reject Vatican Council II (Cushingism) like the Franciscans of the Immaculate.They use Rahner's Theology and even teach it at the University of St.Anslem controlled by the Masons.
They are so far from the teachings of St. Benedict - whose feast day they will all celebrate - as if it is a political event, approved by the Left.

-Lionel Andrades




February 28, 2017
Image result for Abbazia di Santa Scolastica Subiaco Photos
State allows Benedictine monks in Italy to live the Rule of St.Benedict but not his theology

No comments: