Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi, John Martignoni and St. Stefano Visintin osb indicate that Pope Francis has violated the Principle of Non Contradiction in his interpretation of Vatican Council II.
The pope has made a mistake.
There is a choice. He can correct the mistake.
The pope assumed unseen people are seen.This was objectively wrong.
He then assumed that these invisible people were living examples of salvation outside the Church, they were saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.
But this is false. Since these people do not exist in real life, in our reality.
LG 16, LG 8, LG 14, AG 7, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical cases but the pope assumes they are objective cases. Since he considers them a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
In this way Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with Tradition.
If LG 16, LG 8, LG 14 etc were not objective exceptions to the old exclusivist ecclesiology, then it would mean the pope considers them as being invisible and theoretical cases.
Invisible people are objective exceptions to all needing to be members of the Church for salvation in 2017? Think about it. Is this real? Can a pope reason like this?
Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson says 'No'.They are not exceptions to the dogma EENS.He has said that Vatican Council II without the irrational premse is traditional and he has called upon the Society of St.Pius X to accept Vatican Council II. He means Vatican Council II without the use of the irrational premise in the interpretation.
So we have Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) without the irrational premise and Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) with the irrational premise.
Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson, Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi, John Martignoni and Fr. Stefano Visintin osb are in harmony with Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) when they say invisible cases are just invisible.
Pope Francis violates the Principle of Non Contradiction when he assumes invisible cases are visible and so LG 16, LG 8, UR 3 etc are exceptions to the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.So EENS is no more like it was for the missionaries of the 16th century, for Pope Francis, since Vatican Council II is a rupture ' a development'.
It was a development. This was confirmed by Pope Benedict XVI in March 2016 for Avvenire.
Pope Francis can switch to Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) but then he would be contradicting Pope Benedict 's statement on Vatican Council II being a rupture with EENS.
If Pope Francis chooses Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) it would be easier for the SSPX and the Franciscans of the Immaculate to accept the Council.It would also be easier for the Sacred Heart Major Seminary in Detroit, where Ralph Martin and Robert Fastigggi teach, to accept a rational and traditional interpretation of Vatican Council II.
Now the pope is setting a bad example, a heretical example for the Church with Vatican Council II (Cushingite). -Lionel Andrades
Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi, John Martignoni and Fr.Stefano Visintin osb agree that somebody invisible cannot be visible at the same time