Journalists and bloggers did not put the right questions to Cardinal Robert Sarah at the event this week at the Angelicum University in Rome.Edward Pentin, Fr. Zuhlsdorf and others did not say :
1."Your Eminence, there is blogger who says invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance (I.I) are not visible exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).So Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church for him are not a rupture with the past ecclesiology of the Mass.What have you to say about this?
2.He also says that we do not know of any practical exceptions to the dogma EENS,this year.We cannot meet or see any one saved outside the Church i.e without faith and the baptism of water.So for him there is no change in the ecclesiology of the Church.It is the same as when the missionaries in the 16th offered Mass in Latin.However this is not the ecclesiology of Cardinal Sarah he says.
3.For him the Tridentine Rite Mass offered by you(Cardinal Sarah) is a rupture with the ecclesiology of the Mass at the times of St. Paul.The ecclesiology at that time was exclusivist. Every one needed to be baptized with water in the Early Church, the early communities.They had to believe in Jesus as their Saviour and his teachings on faith and morals, for salvation. Do you agree?
4.For the blogger the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made an objective error in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case when it assumed that invisible for us BOD, BOB and I.I were visible examples of salvation outside the Church.So the dogma EENS, upon which depended the past ecclesiology of the Church and which was the ecclesiology of the Mass, has been superseded. Do you agree?
5.He says Cardinal Sarah interprets hypothetical cases in the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II as not being hypothetical.So his conclusion is non traditional with this irrational reasoning.This can be changed if he corrects himself.Would you be willing to change this irrational reasoning, the false premise (invisible people are visible in our reality) which results in a non traditional conclusion?
6.Could you affirm the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS since we know that invisible for us BOD, BOB and I.I are not visible exceptions to the dogma EENS, they are irrelevant to EENS in 2017? Then you would be back to the old ecclesiology upon which was based the ecumenism of return?-Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 16, 2017
It is with an irrational and heretical ecclesiology that Cardinal Sarah offers Holy Mass and is approved by the liberal popes and the Left
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/09/it-is-with-irrational-and-heretical.html
SEPTEMBER 16, 2017
Cardinal Sarah affirms a vague Christology without the necessity of being a member of the Catholic Church for salvation : this is a rupture with the past ecclesiology of the Greek and Latin Mass
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/09/cardinal-sarah-affirms-vague.html
SEPTEMBER 15, 2017
Read the Catechism of the Catholic Church rationally it does not contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus : most Catholics have it wrong
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/09/if-you-read-catechism-of-catholic.html
SEPTEMBER 14, 2017
USCCB RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION AT PNAC :US GOVERNMENT SHOULD ADDRESS IT
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/09/usccb-religious-discrimination-at-pnac.html
SEPTEMBER 14, 2017
U.S Attorney General, House Ethics Committee could file a case of deception and cheating against the USCCB : discriminates against Catholics
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/09/us-attorney-general-house-ethics.html
SEPTEMBER 14, 2017
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment