Wednesday, December 20, 2017

Dominus Iesus is not Feeneyite but uses the irrational Cushingite theology.Cardinal Kasper is correct.

Question for Matthew Bellisario:
So you agree that Dominus Iesus is not Feeneyite.It does not state that every one needs to be a Catholic. So Cardinal Kasper was correct for you? There is a theological basis in magisterial text for what he was saying ? 1
Lionel:
Yes! Dominus Iesus is not Feeneyite. Cardinal Kasper is correct. He knows that ecclesiology has been changed.
Boston's Richard Cardinal Cushing.
Dominus Iesus is Cushingite.It is based on unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance being visible exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).This is an irrational philosophy used to create a new theology and it is magisterial. It was approved by the liberal theologian Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger in Redemptoris Missio and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
Image result for Photo of Cardinal Walter KasperSo when Pope Benedict and Cardinal Kasper state that Jews do not need to convert in the present times they are saying this based on magisterial documents approved by Cardinal Ratzinger.
If this fact was brought to Pope Benedict's attention he would agree.He would say that he was following the theological pattern of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and then Vatican Council II.
The first part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 affirms Feeneyite EENS as it was traditionally known over the centuries. So Dominus Iesus 20 supports this orthodox teaching.
The second part of the 1949 Letter assumes invisible for us cases of the baptism of desire,blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are examples of salvation outside the Church. They are examples of known people saved outside the Church.So they are exceptions to the first part of the Letter and to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS. So there are so many passages which suggest that there is salvation outside the Church.For example the Church is 'the sacrament of salvation' is another vague reference to also being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire.Yet we not know any such case, we do not know any person saved as such in the present times.
There is a reference to  'the universality of salvation' as if it is in opposition to exclusive salvation.
The Church rejects nothing which good and holy in other religions(NA 2) is mentioned at the onset, as if there are known cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church. There are none.
It refers to 'the recent Magisterium of the Church' and the seeds of truth found outside the Church.This is the new theology from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston.2
So probably Cardinal Walter Kasper vetted Dominus Iesus before it was issued by Cardinal Ratzinger, fellow liberal theologian.
This is heretical theology creating new doctrines approved by ecclesiastical Masonry. They have rejected the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS from Feeneyite EENS to Cushingite EENS, interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of rational and traditional Feeneyism and produced Dominus Iesus which does not clearly say that all need to enter the Catholic Church with no exceptions but instead is written in the familiar Vaticanese style to accomodate the heresy in the 1949 Holy Office mistake.
-Lionel Andrades


2
Thus, the recent Magisterium of the Church has firmly and clearly recalled the truth of a single divine economy: “The Spirit's presence and activity affect not only individuals but also society and history, peoples, cultures and religions... The Risen Christ ‘is now at work in human hearts through the strength of his Spirit'... Again, it is the Spirit who sows the ‘seeds of the word' present in various customs and cultures, preparing them for full maturity in Christ”.38 While recognizing the historical-salvific function of the Spirit in the whole universe and in the entire history of humanity,39 the Magisterium states: “This is the same Spirit who was at work in the incarnation and in the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus and who is at work in the Church. He is therefore not an alternative to Christ nor does he fill a sort of void which is sometimes suggested as existing between Christ and the Logos. Whatever the Spirit brings about in human hearts and in the history of peoples, in cultures and religions, serves as a preparation for the Gospel and can only be understood in reference to Christ, the Word who took flesh by the power of the Spirit ‘so that as perfectly human he would save all human beings and sum up all things'”.40

No comments: