Slaying the “Spirit” of Vatican II With the Light of Truth by Fr. Robert J. Araujo S.J. is ' the spirit of Vatican Council II'

Slaying the “Spirit” of Vatican II With the Light of Truth by Fr. Robert J. Araujo S.J. is part of the spirit of Vatican Council II and it presents the liberal and heretical version of Vatican Council II interpreted with a false premise.
I would not read it.

The false spirit of Vatican Council II was expressed when Pope Benedict said that Vatican Council II was a development of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), as it was known to the missionaries of the 16th century.Ths is the new false theology shared by the contributors to this book.

ZUHLSDORF AND LIKOUDIS POLITICALLY CORRECT

None of the contributors will interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise for then the Council would be in harmony with the magisterium of the 16th century. James Likoudis and Fr. John Zuhlsdorf don't want to be Feeneyite and Anti-Semitic.

FALSE THEOLOGY IS THE ORIGIN OF THE SPIRIT OF VATICAN COUNCIL II

The 'origin of the problem of the spirit of Vatican Council II ' was choosing to interpret all hypothetical cases (LG 16 etc) as being concrete and non hypothetical. It was then inferred that these hypothetical cases were actual exceptions to the dogma EENS.They were supposed to be  examples of known salvation outside the Church. So with this emergence of this known salvation outside the Church,approved by Cardinal Ratzinger, the old ecclesiology is eliminated.There is the false theology attributed wrongly to Vatican Council II.This is the origin of their so called 'spirit of Vatican Council II'.

NO MISSION BECAUSE OF VATICAN COUNCIL II(CUSHINGITE)
There is no traditional mission since there is alleged salvation outside the Church as Pope Benedict suggested in March 2016.Call it the official spirit of Vatican Council II(Cushingite).
With the known salvation outside the Church there is the new ecumenism without the need for Protestants and Orthodox Christians needing to convert formally into the Church to avoid Hell.This is the spirit of deception and not Vatican Council II.
Why proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King when Pope Benedict and the liberal author of this  book indicates there are known non-Catholics saved outside the Church, even though no one can see them or know their names.This falsehood is not part of my interpretation of Vatican Council II.

BLAME IS WRONGLY BEING PLACED ON VATICAN COUNCIL II
This is not the spirit of Vatican Council II this is the spirit of deception and evil.The blame is wrongly being placed on Vatican Council II.

I avoid the false premise of the contributors to this book.So Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the past ecclesiology for me as it is for them.
Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) does not contradict the dogma EENS as it was known to Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston or the missionaries in the 16th century.There is no change in the ecclesiology of the Church before and after Vatican Council II for me.

This is the difference between me and Fr. Robert J. Araujo S.J.
It is the same Vatican Council II but we are miles apart.The fault does not lie with the Council but with the deception in the book and its support by the two popes and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.-Lionel Andrades

http://wdtprs.com/blog/2018/01/book-notes-what-im-receiving-and-reading-about-the-spirit-of-vatican-ii-the-devil-priests-in-history/