Cardinal Ratzinger and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria in Christianity and the World Religions(ITC 1997) are in schism with the past Church Councils and popes.They can issue a correction if they want to.

In 1997 Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and Fr. Luiz Ladaria s.j,President, ITC, began the elimination of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).They did this by interpreting Vatican Council II with the for and against EENS method.They also interpreted EENS with the invisible cases of the baptism of desire are visible exceptions to EENS method. The result can be seen on the Vatican website.1 It is a webpage in Italian from the daily L'Osservatorio Romano. It is a summary of the International Theological Commissions paper Christianity and the World Religions (1997).(Il Cristianesimo e le Altre Grandi Religiono)

Since 1997 Cardinal Ratzinger has chosen to interpret Vatican Council II and EENS using an irrational premise to create a non traditional conclusion. It would be a break with EENS and the past ecclesiology of the Church. So there is a new understanding of EENS for Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j.It is EENS with exceptions, a non traditional EENS.Then there is a Vatican Council II having exceptions to traditional EENS.Both are an innovation in the Church.

For me there is a Vatican Council II with no exceptions to traditional EENS .There is also a traditional EENS for me and I do not know of an EENS with exceptions.

Then as if to complete his life's work of error Pope Benedict in March 2016(Avvenire) said that EENS today( with his exceptions) is no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century( there were no exceptions for them). Since for him( and not for me) there was 'a development' with Vatican Council II (with exceptions to EENS).This is the only interpretation of Vatican Council II he seems to know.So he questioned the need for mission when Vatican Council II for him( and not for me) indicates that there is salvation outside the Church.This would seem reasonble, since for him there is only a Vatican Council II with exceptions to EENS.

All this is subterfuge or an innocent mistake, Masonic or just ignorance? I don't know.

Fr.Luiz Ladaria s.j was the President of the Intenational Theological Commission when this error was made in 1997.He interpreted Vatican Council II and EENS with an objective mistake.He is now the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF).

The Prefect of the CDF  does not interpret Vatican Council II like me.Neither does he interpret EENS like I do.

He has created a different version of Vatican Council II and EENS which is an innovation and differs from my traditional and rational approach.By avoiding the false premise I automatically go back to the old theology. I do not have to create any thing new.

I have no agenda to follow. I do not have to please any lobby. I am just interpreting Vatican Council II as I read it.

Cardinal Ratzinger and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria in Christianity and the World Religions(ITC 1997) are in schism with the past Church Councils and popes.

They can issue a correction if they want to.

-Lionel Andrades

1.

COMMISSIONE TEOLOGICA INTERNAZIONALE

  IL CRISTIANESIMO E LE ALTRE GRANDI RELIGIONI

Uno studio della Commissione Teologica Internazionale*

(1997)

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_cti_1997_cristianesimo-religioni-studio-cti_it.html