Ann Barnhardt will not submit

Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition only because Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre  and the present magisterium are correct for everyone  and Fr. Leonard Feeney is wrong.If Fr. Leonard Feeney was correct  and the magisterium  and the SSPX were wrong then Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors, extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the past ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.

So Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition for Ann Barnhardt since she deplores Feeneyism and accepts Cushingism which is the theology of  Archbishop Lefebvre  and the SSPX traditionalists.

With Feeneyisn (according to Lionel Andrades and not the SBC), which is the rational and traditional philosophy and theology of the Catholic Church, Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Center of Boston were correct.Pope Pius XII and Cardinal Richard Cushing, the Archbishop of Boston were wrong.

________











________

So Ann Barnhardt with the present magisterium (since Pope Pius XII) is in heresy. Since she rejects the Syllabus of Errors and the past ecclesiology  with her interpretation of Vatican Council II.She does not choose the rational philosophy and traditional theology.She interprets Vatican Council II and EENS with the irrational philosophy and non traditional theology of Cushingism( according to Lionel Andrades).

Like the Lefbvrist traditionalist Hilary White, she does not understand the difference between Feeneyism and Cushingism as a theology.Also their need for their traditionalists blog-donors makes it difficult to switch to rational Feeneyism.

To change the Nicene Creed by assuming unknown non Catholics, are known exceptions,  to all needing the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, is a first class heresy.It is a mortal sin.

They attend the Tridentine Rite Mass as if all is normal and criticize Holy Mass in the vernacular, without publicly recanting their heresy, a mortal sin of faith.

Ann will not submit to Vatican Council II interpreted according to the authentic Magisterium of the Church.Neither will she affirm EENS according to the missionaries and magisterium of the 16th century.They did not consider invisible- for- us baptism of desire as being  visible. So it was not an objective example of salvation outside the Church for them. Nor was it an exception to the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation.The dogma has been defined by three Church Councils and none of them mentioned the baptism of desire.-Lionel Andrades

FEBRUARY 3, 2018

SSPX is in doctrinal error like the magisterium and there is no denial from them : through their silence they admit their mistake

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/sspx-is-in-doctrinal-error-like.html

 FEBRUARY 3, 2018

Ann Barnhardt cannot meet a baptism of desire (BOD) case in 2018 : Did Archbishop Lefebvre make a mistake ?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/ann-barnhardt-cannot-meet-baptism-of.html

FEBRUARY 2, 2018

Would Ann Barnhardt be able to say that the SSPX bishops and Archbishop Lefebvre made an objective mistake?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/would-ann-barnhardt-be-able-to-say-that.html

FEBRUARY 2, 2018

Repost : Hilary White and Massimo Faggioli interpret the Catechism, Vatican Council II and Letter of the Holy Office with hypothetical cases not being hypothetical : so there is a rupture with Tradition (with graphics)

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/repost-hilary-white-and-massimo.html

 FEBRUARY 2, 2018

So when I am sent these long lists of potential baptism of desire and baptism of blood references they are meaningless. Since for me they never ever were an exception to EENS. The magisterium made a mistake.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/so-when-i-am-sent-these-long-lists-of.html

FEBRUARY 2, 2018

So why are you sending me these references to the BOD? What has it to do with Feeneyite EENS?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/so-why-are-you-sending-me-these.html

FEBRUARY 2, 2018

Traditionalist bloggers( Mundabor, Ann Barnhardt , David Domet, Louie Verracchio and Tantumblogo ) are Cushingites,innovators in theology and doctrine like Cardinal Ratzinger and Archbishop 

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/traditionalist-bloggers-are.html

 FEBRUARY 1, 2018

Ann Barnhardt needs to study Feeneyism according to Lionel Andrades.It is different from Feeneyism according to Wikipedia and the SSPX

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/ann-barnhardt-needs-to-study-feeneyism.html

JANUARY 31, 2018

There is no empirical evidence to suggest St Emerentiana is in Heaven without the baptism of water and so is an exception to EENS and the Nicene Creed  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/there-is-no-empirical-evidence-to.html

JANUARY 30, 2018

So it all starts from St. Emerentiana ...

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/so-it-all-starts-from-st-emerentiana.html

JANUARY 30, 2018

The way you look at St. Emerentiana decides how you interpret Vatican Council II http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/the-way-you-look-at-st-emerentiana.html

ANUARY 28, 2018

You decide

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/you-decide.html

JANUARY 27, 2018

What is Cushingism ?(Graphics)

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/what-is-cushingism-graphics.html

JANUARY 27, 2018

What is Feeneyism? (Graphics)

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/what-is-feeneyism.html