Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j in schism : enforcing it on the whole Church

Cardinal Luiz  Ladaria s.j is in schism with the past Magisterium.I instead interpret magisterial documents in harmony with the past Magisteriums.I simply avoid an irrational premise.

For him Vatican Council II is a rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the past ecclesiology.He uses an irrational premise to create this break with the past. I avoid the premise. So for me Vatican Council II is not a  rupture with the Syllabus of Errors .

Cardinal Ladaria, Cardinal Mueller and Pope Benedict rejected the Syllabus of Errors. They did not celebrate its 170 anniversay a few years back. For them the Council was 'a development'.Since there is known salvation outside the Church for them, hypothetical cases are examples of this known salvation, this development of a dogma.

Outside the Church there can be no known salvation for me. Only God can know if there is an exception to the norm.The norm for salvation is being a member of the Catholic Church(Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441). Baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood (BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I)  are not the norm.Neither can they be known  as exceptions.

The present Magisterium of ecclesiastics are using Vatican Council II to create a schism with the past popes and they act as if there is only one interpretation of the Council.I know of another one.It is rational, traditional and non heretical. 

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria interprets the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).For me there is no rupture.

Pope Benedict confirmed this schism in March 2016(Avvenire) when he said that EENS is no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.He said that there was a development with Vatican Council II. He meant that he would not interpret Vatican Council II like me and so then there would not be a rupture with the past.This was the developent.He also calls the dogma EENS, defined by three Church Councils an 'aphorism'(CCC 846)

So with this official schism he says that the problem with the SSPX is doctrinal. They have to interpret Vatican Council II like him and not me . They have to choose heresy and schism for canonical status.

The SSPX could affirm Vatican Council II and EENS like me i.e treat hypothetical cases as just being hypothetical, but this is not being asked of them by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

Since BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS the inference is that these are known people saved outside the Church. Pope Benedict, Cardinal Ladaria and Cardinal Muller imply that these are visible and known people who are examples of non Catholics saved outside the Church. Since they are known cases saved without the baptism of water outside the Church, this new teaching contradicts the Nicene Creed. In the Creed we say, 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins'.It is the baptism of water. Now the understanding is 'I believe in three or more baptisms, they are desire, blood and invincible ignorance and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church'. It is the Holy Spirit, mentioned in the Nicene Creed which is supposed to have taught this irrationality according to the present Magisterium.

So when we say in the Nicene Creed I believe in the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church it means , the Catholic Church with the new ecclesiology.This new ecclesiology is based on invisible for us BOD, BOB and I.I being a visible rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology. In the past ecclesiology BOD, BOB and I.I were considered  hypothetical cases. Not any more.

Since there is known salvation outside the Church, for all these liberals, who would be approved by ecclesiastical Masonry, Cardinal Marx gives the Eucharist to Protestants and Pope Francis says Protestants are redeemed.

With the use of an irrational premise Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II as a rupture with the past ecclesiology of the Church. The past ecclesiology would be triumphalism for him and the Masons.This is schism, official schism, pontifical schism.There is a choice, a hermeneutic of continuity but it is being rejected.A break from the past is intentionally being sought and Cardinal Cupich calls it a paradigm shift coming from Vatican Council II.He means Vatican Council II as interpreted by Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria and not me.So Cardinal Marx says there is no more an ecumenism of return for Protestants in Germany.

I affirm the Syllabus of Errors and the ecumenism of return based on the past ecclesiology of the Church which is not contradicted by Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise.

I refuse to go into schism by  interpreting magisterial documents with the invisible- people- are- visible offical linr, which creates a rupture with the past popes and the Syllabus of Errors on ecumenism, non Christian religions etc.-Lionel Andrades

 FEBRUARY 23, 2018

This is how Michael Voris, Louie Verrechio, the FSSP and SSPX must re-read the text of Vatican Council II.It means there is no known salvation outside the Church, Protestants are on the way to Hell unless they convert into the Church, inter faith marriages are adultery and Protestants receiving the Eucharist are in a sacrilege

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/this-is-how-michael-voris-louie.html