Conservative Catholics too are supporting heresy( new version of Vatican Council II,EENS, Catechisms etc) and schism( a rupture with the Magisterium of the 16th century with Vatican Council II).

It was commonly known that the present Magisterium was in schism with the past Magisterium but every one would would it brush it off and say Vatican Council II was responsible for this.They were really referring to Vatican Council II interpreted with the irrational premise and this was not known to Catholics.

Now we know. We've stumbled on to the missing link.If this was a ruse we have found it out. If it was a simple mistake we can now correct it.The truth is out finally.

It was only by interpreting Vatican Council II with an irrational premise that the liberals and Masons could create a schism with the past Magisterium of the Church.

Now we simply avoid the false premise(invisible people are physically visible in the present times) and the interpretation of Vatican Council II is no more schismatic.

Catholics no more have to support heresy.

CMRI, MHFM and other Catholics who went into sedevacantism because of Vatican Council II and the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I)- being interpreted by them with the false premise - can now re-interpret the Council.

The SSPX can re-interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors while conservative and liberal Catholic heretics, will no more  be able to cite any reference in the text of the Council to support themselves.They depended on the false premise.

The old concept of liberals and traditionalists has now taken a jolt and could crumble or change.Since even Christopher Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei interpret Vatican Council II schismatically.They use the false premise and then reject the conclusion and blame it all on Vatican Council II.I don't interpret the Council like them.So I support Vatican Council II( premise-free).

But Remnant News, Catholic Herald and other Catholic media use the invisible people are visible premise.So do the apologists at Catholic Answers, EWTN and the National Catholic Register. It's the same with cardinals Kasper,Koch and Marx.



Conservative Catholics too are supporting heresy( new version of Vatican Council II,EENS, Catechisms etc) and schism( a rupture with the Magisterium of the 16th century with Vatican Council II).

Note: It is important when reading Vatican Council II not to assume the text as for and against EENS. Since this is a sign that the false premise is being used unknowingly.-Lionel Andrades

FEBRUARY 24, 2018

 

SSPX begin negotiations with Abp. Guido Pozzo : ask if Vatican Council II can be interpreted with the Lionel Andrades model.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/sspx-begin-negotiations-with-abp-guido.html

FEBRUARY 24, 2018

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j is in schism error needs to be recanted : Catholics have to affirm heresy and schism of the present Magisterium in the name of Vatican Council II interpreted with a false premise to elicit a non traditional and heretical conclusion which is a break with the past Magisterium of the Church.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-sj-is-in-schism.html

FEBRUARY 24, 2018

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF),Vatican has no objections if all Catholic religious communities affirm Vatican Council II without the irrational premise : information exclusively on Lionel's Blog

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/the-congregation-for-doctrine-of.html