Feeneyism, Cushingism is a tool to identify the error in Vatican Council II(Cushingite), avoid it and return back to the past ecclesiology of the Church without rejecting Vatican Council II(Feeneyite).

Feeneyism according to Lionel Andrades says there are no known cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) in 2018.There were none in 1949 and 1960-1965.Neither at the time of St.Emerentiana.So when the popes, cardinals and bishops at Vatican Council II assumed that there were known cases of BOD,BOB and I.I, they made a mistake.They concluded that there were visible and known cases of BOD,BOB and I.I which were examples of salvation outside the Church.So for them there were exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) as it was interpreted over the centuries.So Vatican Council II had to become a rupture on ecumenism,a rupture with Feeneyite EENS and the past ecclesiology of the Church.The Syllabus of Errors was rejected.

So now we have the Nicene Creed, EENS, Vatican Council II etc interpreted with Cushingism( according to L.A) which uses the false premise(invisible people are visible) and false conclusion(they are objective exceptions to EENS and an example of salvation outside the Church).This is the Cushingite innovation in the Church which make traditionalists heretics and conservatives modernists(like the bloggers Ann Barnhardt and Mundabor).

So I recite the Profession of Faith with Feeneyite philosophy( invisible people are invisible only) and theology( outside the Church there is no known salvation) while other Catholics recite the Profession of Faith with Cushingite philosophy(invisible people are visible in the present times) and theology( there is known salvation outside the Church).

So our concept of 'one holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church'(ecclesiology) is different.

Our concept of the Holy Spirit's teachings is different.Pope Benedict confirmed this in March 2016 when he said that EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century. For him EENS is Cushingite and for the 16th century magisterium it was Feeneyite.

For me the Nicene Creed refers to 'One (known) baptism for the forgiveness of sins( the baptism of water).For the others it is 'I believe in three or more baptisms for the forgiveness of sins(desire, blood, invincible ignorance) and they exclude the baptism of water'.

Same Church-but different doctrines and theology.

Different meanings to the Profession of Faith.

So when I refer to Feeneyism it is because the rest of the Church is using Cushingism and it is normal for them. So I have to correct the error.It is they who have brought something foreign and new into the Church and it is not me who has done this.

I call  the old theology Feeneyism and the new theology Cushingism to identify precisely what I mean.Others can call the same thing something else.Some names could be, Sixteenth Century Magisterial Theology and Twentyfirst Century Magisterial Theology, Old Jesuit Middle Age Theology and New Jesuit Modernist Theology etc.

Feeneyism, Cushingism is a tool to identify the error in Vatican Council II(Cushingite), avoid it and return back to the past ecclesiology of the Church without rejecting Vatican Council II(Feeneyite).

-Lionel Andrades