CMRI website says Vatican Council II contradicts Syllabus of Errors. This is false.

See.The website of the sedevacantist religious congregation,Congregatio Mariae Reginae Immaculate(CMRI) says Vatican Council II contradicts the Syllabus of Errors, Quanta Cura etc.This is false. I repeat - this is false. 1

Only Vatican Council II interpreted with LG 8, LG 16, LG 14, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as referring to visible and known people saved outside the Church, contradicts the Syllabus of Errors.

Vatican Council II interpreted with LG 8, LG 16 etc as referring to invisible and unknown people in 2018, or the past, saved outside the Church does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).There is no rupture with Tradition.

So it is the CMRI which has made the mistake with the wrong interpretation. The fault does not lie with Vatican Council II.

Similarly on their website the baptism of desire(BOD) is an exception to Feeneyite EENS. 2

Again they mean BOD which is visible in personal cases and excludes the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, which is an exception to Feeneyite EENS.

BOD which is hypothetical, speculative, a concept only , cannot be a concrete example of salvation outside the Catholic Church in 2018. So it does not contradict Feeneyite EENS.

So the CMRI does not affirm Feeneyite EENS because of known cases of BOD etc and they interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Feeneyite EENS because of known cases of LG 8 etc, known people saved outside the Church for CMRI.

I have a rational choice and take it.Where are the practical examples of people saved with BOD, BOB and I.I or LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, GS 22 etc in real life for CMRI? There are none.

-Lionel Andrades

1.
Theological Position: Sede Vacante

The Roman Catholic priests of the Religious Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen profess and adhere to the Catholic Faith as it has been consistently 

taught throughout the centuries since the time of Christ. With the death of Pope Pius XII and with the convocation of the Second Vatican Council, an unprecedented situation has befallen the Church, which threatens her very doctrines and worship. In order to provide for the preservation of the Catholic Faith and the traditional Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and Sacraments, the following statement has been drawn up for the purpose of clearly defining the actual position that these priests have taken.

I. VATICAN COUNCIL II: Convoked by John XXIII for the purpose of “updating” the Church, this council (held from 1962-65) decreed and implemented teachings which had been previously condemned by the Infallible Teaching Magisterium of the Church. The Second Vatican Council’s heretical teachings were primarily in the areas of religious liberty and false ecumenism. These were previously condemned by:

   Pope Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos (1832)

   Pope Pius IX in Quanta Cura and Syllabus of Errors (1864)

   Pope Leo XIII in Immortale Dei (1865) and Libertas Humana (1888)

   Pope Pius XI in Quas Primas (1925) and Mortalium Animos (1928)

   Pope Pius XII in Mystici Corporis (1943)

THEREFORE, the Second Vatican Council is to be rejected as a false council because it has erred in its teachings on faith and morals.

http://www.cmri.org/why-we-believe-the-chair-of-peter-is-vacant.shtml

2.

http://www.cmri.org/02-baptism_blood-desire_quotes.shtml