Placiut Deo is a heretical document since Cardinal Ladaria interprets Vatican Council II with the for and against EENS method instead of the for and neutral to EENS interpretation.So the result is a rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and Tradition in general.
Yet this is how Fr. John Zuhlsdorf also interprets magisterial documents. So he is not going to comment upon this point.
For him invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood (BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are visible and objective exceptions to tradtional EENS. So like Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Morlino he will not comment on Placiut Deo proclaiming Jesus without the need for membership in the Catholic Church for salvation.
On his blog he has placed a screen shot of the CDF Letter and another which says Don't touch, which is his motto on this subject.
The journalists at the Press Conference did not touch the error of Cardinal Ladaria when he projected Lumen Gentium 8 as an exception to the old teaching on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.They too interpret Vatican Council II like Fr. John Zuhlsdorf. It is not the for and neutral to EENS approach.
Similarly the conservative bloggers today have not reported on how Vatican Council II(LG 8) would be in harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS with the for and neutral interpretation of Vatican Councl II -text.
This approach would be a nightmare for the liberal theologians who have controlled theology and changed doctrine with this simple ruse.They continue with it even after being informed.-Lionel Andrades
This approach would be a nightmare for the liberal theologians who have controlled theology and changed doctrine with this simple ruse.They continue with it even after being informed.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment