The Letter (Placuit Deo) on non exclusive salvation is being faulted not so much for what it says but as for what it does not say and so allows heresy, schism and gnostism to flourish.

The Letter (Placiut Deo) on non exclusive salvation is being faulted not so much for what it says but as for what it does not say and so allows heresy, schism and gnosticism to flourish.

In its seeming innocence it is blatant  as to put down the Nicene Creed, Outside the Church No Salvation,Vatican Council II and the Catechisms.

A  lady journalist asked Cardinal Ladaria  what happened to the old teachings on exclusive salvation and the superiority of the Catholic Church.Ladaria faked it and interpreted Lumen Gentium 8 as referring to known people, saved outside the Church. Where are these known people in 2018? Who saw someone saved outside the Church ? What was his or her name?
Who saw someone saved with BOD, BOB and I.I over the last 50 years? No one!
But the inference, for him is that there is salvation outside the Church.With this ruse the liberal theologian rejects the thrice defined dogma on outside the Church there is no salvation, which comes from Jesus' teachings in John 3:5 and Mark 16:16.

Jesus said that those who do not believe will be condemned.The baptism of water was necessary for salvation in the Early Christian communities, the Early Church.This was known to the Apostles and Church Fathers and can be seen in their writings.

Ladaria was stubbornly following Cushingite theology when he had an alternative rational choice.He wanted a hermeneutic of rupture to please his bosses,

His New Theology, Cushingite Theology, comes from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr.Leonard Feeney.That non Catholic letter too, assumes hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are non hypothetical examples of salvation which the Church considers exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

So he wanted a rupture with the teachings of Jesus and the Apostles. Unknown people, known only to God, became alleged exceptions to Scripture, Tradition and the past Magisterium.

We now have a new Magisterium which invites all of us to believe invisible cases of the baptism of desire(LG 14) and invincible ignorance(LG 16) etc are objective examples of salvation outside the Church in 2018.

This is Cushingism as opposed to traditional Feeneyism.This was the theology of the Council Fathers at Vatican Council II and it cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.Since the Holy Spirit cannot violate the Principle of Non Contradiction and make an objective mistake.
Other Catholics have detected the ruse. Every one is not on board.Cardinal Ladaria and Pope Benedict still have my interpretation of Vatican Council II before their face.

I am not rejecting Vatican Council II also,but it is in harmony  with the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors.

Can Archbishops Guido Pozzo and Augustine Di Noia at the CDF  say the same? No!

Ask them to affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS  and the Syllabus of Errors along with implicit for us and known only to God, BOD,BOB and I.I.
Ask this of  those who will pretend that the Letter is a continuity with the past .

I affirm invisible for us BOD,BOB and I.I and EENS according to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century and the Church Fathers.

Who can match this at the CDF?

Over five years and they have maintained their 'polite' silence.

I have nothing new to say. No innovation for me.No schism for me.Heresies of faith, like those of morals, are mortal sins for me.-Lionel Andrades

MARCH 1, 2018

Cardinal Ladaria presents a gnostic and heretical document which is a schism with the past popes and Magisterium

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/the-letter-placiut-deo-on-salvation-is.html