Is the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood( BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) theoretical, imaginary,unknown in personal cases and speculative for you in 2018?
Were they the same for you throughout your life, ask yourself?
Looking at it from another way BOD, BOB and I.I never ever referred to a concrete person whom I know, or knew, who had been saved as such, or who had been saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. It has never referred to a person whose name and surname I would know or have known. It has never been someone whom I could physically see on earth.I guess its the same for all human beings.
But it was not so for Cardinal Ladaria.
CARDINAL LADARIA'S MISTAKE IS ALSO THERE IN THE ITC THEOLOGICAL PAPERS
But it was not so for Cardinal Ladaria.
CARDINAL LADARIA'S MISTAKE IS ALSO THERE IN THE ITC THEOLOGICAL PAPERS
This was the mistake Cardinal Luiz Ladaria made at the Press Conference on March 1 on Placuit Deo.Since he confuses BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to a concrete person and not someone theoretical and imaginary,there are exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus for him(See Christianity and the World Religions of the International Theological Commission. He was the President). So the Church no more teaches the superiority and exclusiveness of salvation in the Catholic Church for him.
AT VATICAN COUNCIL II THEY MADE THE SAME MISTAKE
Hypothetical cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I were also non hypothetical cases for the Council Fathers at Vatican Council II. So for them Lumen Gentium 8,which really is hypothetical, was not hypothetical but a concrete case of someone saved outside the Church.
FOR CARDINAL LADARIA LUMEN GENTIUM 8 WAS NOT THEORETICAL
Similarly for Cardinal Ladaria, Lumen Gentium 8 was not theoretical, imaginary, unknown in personal cases and speculative in 2018.Since it was an exception to EENS for him. So he told the lady journalist from the Associated Press that there is no more exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
FOR ME LUMEN GENTIUM 8 IS THEORETICAL
FOR ME LUMEN GENTIUM 8 IS THEORETICAL
I physically cannot see people saved in BOD,BOB and I.I nor in LG 8, LG 16 etc.I can only accept them theoretically, speculatively,hypothetically, subjectively, as a concept.So I also in faith believe in the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.It is not an either-or case for me.
NO CLASH FOR ME BETWEEN LUMEN GENTIUM 8 AND EENS
NO CLASH FOR ME BETWEEN LUMEN GENTIUM 8 AND EENS
So there is no clash for me between Lumen Gentium 8 and the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
IT ALSO DOES NOT HAVE TO BE BOD, BOB AND I.I OR EENS
IT ALSO DOES NOT HAVE TO BE BOD, BOB AND I.I OR EENS
For me it does not have to be BOD, BOB and I.I or EENS. It can be theoretical for us BOD, BOB and I.I and the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.They are compatible.
Similarly it does not have to be LG 8 or EENs. It can be theoretical for us LG 8 along with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS. They are compatible.
FOR CARDINAL LADARIA IT WAS EITHER-OR
FOR CARDINAL LADARIA IT WAS EITHER-OR
For Cardinal Ladaria it was either-or. Either LG 8 or EENS.Since LG 8 did not refer to theoretical cases for him.He was indirectly telling that journalist that it had to be Lumen Gentium 8 or the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.This was his mistake.He referred to a known person saved outside the Church when there cannot be such a known person for us humans.People who are saved in Heaven are known only to God.
Now religious communities and lay movements, in fact all Catholics, can avoid the error of Cardinal Ladaria on March 1,2018.
Now religious communities and lay movements, in fact all Catholics, can avoid the error of Cardinal Ladaria on March 1,2018.
-Lionel Andrades
MARCH 10, 2018
The SSPX must tell Cardinal Ladaria that they want to affirm Vatican Council II with LG 8 not being an exception to the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/the-sspx-must-tell-cardinal-ladaria.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment