SSPX re-open negotiations with Ecclesia Dei without the Ladaria Error. Ask for the right to accept and re-interpret Vatican Council II without the official mistake.
1.Affirm that hypothetical cases mentioned in Vatican Council II are not exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
2.Also affirm that invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood (BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are not exceptions to the rigorist interpretation of the dogma EENS.
Vatican Council II is not a rupture with EENS when these two points are affirmed.
There is a Vatican Council II with and without the Ladaria Error.
Call upon the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the Bishops Conferences to do the same.
SSPX, Tradition, dogmas and doctrines are on your side.Let the Vatican choose schism, you choose orthodoxy in harmony with Vatican Council II.
SSPX, Tradition, dogmas and doctrines are on your side.Let the Vatican choose schism, you choose orthodoxy in harmony with Vatican Council II.
Don't let the mainstream media say that the Society of St. Pius X rejects ' the reforms of Vatican Council II'.It is only with the Ladaria Error, in the interpretation of Vatican Council II,that there are 'the reforms of Vatican Council II'.
-Lionel Andrades
Ladaria Error : It refers to the confusion on Lumen Gentium 8.LG 8 it is inferred refers to known people, physically visible people, non Catholics, who are saved outside the Catholic Church. They are saved allegedly without being members of the Church.These known people are then assumed to be exceptions to the old exclusivist understanding of salvation.
This was the mistake made by Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith at the Press Conference on March 1,2018 on Placuit Deo. The CDF Prefect was responding to a question from a lady journalist of the Associated Press when he made the error.
The mistake comes from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston when it was wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance referred to known people saved outside the Church and so were exceptions to the traditional understanding of outside the Church there is no salvation.
Ladaria Error : It refers to the confusion on Lumen Gentium 8.LG 8 it is inferred refers to known people, physically visible people, non Catholics, who are saved outside the Catholic Church. They are saved allegedly without being members of the Church.These known people are then assumed to be exceptions to the old exclusivist understanding of salvation.
This was the mistake made by Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith at the Press Conference on March 1,2018 on Placuit Deo. The CDF Prefect was responding to a question from a lady journalist of the Associated Press when he made the error.
The mistake comes from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston when it was wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance referred to known people saved outside the Church and so were exceptions to the traditional understanding of outside the Church there is no salvation.
MARCH 13, 2018
MARCH 12, 2018
Lay Catholic Movements tell the Vatican that you interpret Lumen Gentium 8 as referring to only hypothetical cases in 2018
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/lay-catholic-movements-tell-vatican.html
MARCH 12, 2018
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment