Where do you fit in?

For Peter Lamb commentator on the blog Vox Cantoris.

Vatican Council II and EENS can be interpreted with Feeneyite reasoning ( hypothetical cases are only hypothetical).

Vatican Council II and EENS does not have to be interpreted with Cushingite reasoning ( Hypothetical cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, GS 22 are objective examples of known salvation outside the Church).

So we have a choice.

The sedevacantist interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS would be irrational for the informed Catholic and so in future obsolete .

I affirm Vatican Council II and EENS with Feeneyism.

Peter and Michael Dimond affirm EENS with Feeneyism but Vatican Council II with Cushingism.

The traditionalists at the St.Benedict Centre also interpret EENS with Feeneyism but Vatican Council II with Cushingism.

The sedevacantists at the St. Gertrude the Great Church,Ohio, the seminary in Florida of Bishop Donald Sanborn and the sedevancantists at the CMRI, interpret EENS and Vatican Council II with Cushingism.

Where do you fit in?

The traditionalist David Domet (Vox) I think interprets EENS with Feeneyism and Vatican Council II with Cushingism.I am not sure.

Bishop Fellay interprets EENS and Vatican Council II with Cushingism as did Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.

The liberals interpret EENS and Vatican Council II with Cushingism as does the Vatican Curia.

Where do  you fit  in?

-Lionel Andrades

MARCH 17, 2018

Liberalism based on Cushingite Vatican Council II is obsolete.The average Catholic, the rank and file Catholic is intelligent enough to know what is rational and who is faking it.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/liberalism-based-on-cushingite-vatican.html